Mississauga, ON · Charitable organization
Passion to Reach Ministries
Preaching the gospel of jesus christ in canada and around the world through church services seminars concerts and media.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE COUNTRY PARSON | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CCCANADIAN COMMUNITY ALLIANCE NETWORK3× · 2017–2019 · C$67k · revenue -82% · 82% of their budget
- TCTHE COUNTRY PARSON7× · 2017–2024 · C$6k · revenue +48%
- APALL PEOPLES CHURCH3× · 2017–2019 · C$950 · revenue +7%
Funded once
- SASALVATION ARMYone grant, 2019 · C$6k · revenue -82%
- FRFCJ REFUGEE CENTREgraduatedone grant, 2021 · C$3k · revenue +90%
- TCThe Country Parsonone grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue -39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ongoing programs christian radio station evangelism
Provide academic training for the ministry of the gospel
Facilitating the use of alpha evangelistic courses by canadian churches alpha north america and international ministries
Religious prison ministries bible study courses
Holding worship and prayer services to provide spiritual direction and teaching (twice weekly) and outreach into the surrounding community with the message of the gospel of jesus christ.
The vision of Christ Calls Nation is to advance the Christian Faith by preaching teaching and equipping the people with the word of God - the Bible. Prayer is an integral part of the ministry.
Religious gathering for the proclamation of the gospel through television and meetings
To advance religion by preacing the teachings and religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with christian faith.
Training for christian ministry through undergraduate and graduate training.
Christian religious and missionary services
Holding worship services weekly
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Passion to Reach Ministries and the most unlike its peers is William Osler Health System Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.