Toronto, ON · Charitable organization
Partners in Harvest (Canada)
We encourage serve train and counsel pih member congregations pastors ministry leaders.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATCH THE FIRE WORLD | C$28,006 |
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Youth conferences Worship services Leadership and Evangelism.
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
Religeous instruction counselling congregational worship and evangelism.
Worship services - Sundays Prayer meetings - Wednesdays
Maintains a regular place of worship. Outreach and Evangelism Supports Missions
Bible studies prayer meetings
Missionary and teaching the word and spirit message in liberia isreal and dominica with employees and volunteers.
Preaching teaching pastoral care home outreach facilitate worship services
Training qualified leaders from around world to effectively evangelize other national christians.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freedom Centre International Oakville and the most unlike its peers is Bruno Ierullo Ministries - United in Christ. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.