Ogema, SK · Charitable organization
Parish of the Good Shepherd
Due to weather age health and ability only a few services were held.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRIMATES WORLD RELIEF DEVELOPMENT FUND | C$300 |
| AVONLEA MUSEUM | C$250 |
| DEEP SOUTH PIONEER MUSEUM | C$250 |
| COUNCIL OF THE NORTH | C$200 |
| DIOCESE OF QU'APPELLE STUDENT BURSARY | C$200 |
| ANGLICAN JOURNAL | C$100 |
| ANGLICAN FOUNDATION | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$100 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- DODiocese of Qu'Appelle4× · 2017–2020 · C$10k · revenue +40%
- COCOUNCIL OF THE NORTH7× · 2017–2023 · C$2k · revenue -1%
- AMAVONLEA MUSEUM6× · 2017–2023 · C$2k · revenue +73%
Funded once
- DODIOCESE OF QU'APPELLEone grant, 2022 · C$2k
- AJANGLICAN JOURNAL 80 HAYDEN ST TORONTO ONone grant, 2022 · C$300
- OLOGEMA LEGION POPPY FUNDone grant, 2022 · C$50
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.