Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Moose Jaw, SK · Charitable organization

Parish of St. Aidan

Sunday morning and week-day worship services anglican church of canada.

C$55k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$53k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$2k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$53k
C$1,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$624k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANGLICAN DIOCESE OF QU'APPELLEC$53,419
MOOSE JAW WOMEN'S TRANSITION ASSOCIATION INCC$1,000
MOOSE JAW & DISTRICT FOOD BANKC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$409k · 7 repeat orgsC$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against -71% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

C$409k
C$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
-71%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ANGLICAN DIOCESE OF QU'APPELLE
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$385k · revenue +40%
  • MJ
    MOOSE JAW WOMEN'S TRANSITION ASSOCIATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$5k · revenue +43%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY MOOSE JAW CORPS
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$3k · revenue +473%

Funded once

  • PO
    PARISH OF ASSINIBOIA
    one grant, 2021 · C$2k · revenue -71%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sancta Maria House Association

To provide shelter and care to women suffering from addictions age 18 and older who require personal assistance

—
2
House of Refuge Mission

Food and clothing banks soup kitchens helping the homeless

—
3
Souls Harbour Rescue Mission

Operation of community drop in centre providing food clothing and shelter to people struggling with food and housing insecurity. provision of live-in addictions recovery programming. provision of training opportunities for people with…

—
4
Harvest House Atlantic Inc.

Harvest House Atlantic was established in 1999 and continues to support women and men in the Greater Moncton Area who find themselves homeless struggling with substance abuse struggling with mental health or seeking new opportunities to…

—
5
Synod of Diocese of Moosonee

To provide for spiritual and social needs of parisioners and local residents.

—
6
The Moose Jaw Non-Profit Housing Corporation

Moose jaw non-profit housing corporation was created to provide housing solutions to the residents of the city of moose jaw who do not have the financial means to pay for housing at the market rate. to that end it has grown to 5 separate…

—
7
Mattawa Women's Resource Centre

To provide shelter for abused women and their children

—
8
Miramichi Safe Harbour Services Inc.

Operates an emergeny shelter for women and their children.

—
9
Dawn House Services and Housing for Women Inc.

Dawn house services and housing for women inc. provides programs to relieve poverty by providing emergency shelter clothing food and other basic necessities to women in need with or without children an by establishing operating and…

—
10
Joshua House Recovery Ministries

1. Provide drug free Christian faith-based homes (in 6 houses and a 50 person facility) for adult men who are seeking to live a clean drug free life. 2. Provide food and shelter to homeless men on income assistance and employment…

—
11
Thunder Bay Emergency Shelter

.Temporary emergency shelter for homeless individuals .Community feeding program .Managed alcohol program

—
12
Athabasca Good Samaritan Ministries Association

Soup kitchen and accomodation arrangements for transients.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Souls Harbour Rescue Mission Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Synod of the Diocese of Qu'appelle. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetANGLICAN DIOCESE OF QU'APPELLE — C$384,771 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetPWRDF — C$8,610 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOOSE JAW WOMEN'S TRANSITION ASSOCIATION INC — C$5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERSIDE MISSION — C$3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSOULS HARBOUR RESCUE MISSION INC. — C$3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSALVATION ARMY MOOSE JAW CORPS — C$2,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMOOSE JAW & DISTRICT FOOD BANK — C$2,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPARISH OF ASSINIBOIA — C$2,000 over 1y, 16% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps Canadon
PayPal Giving Fund CanadaON3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 872161203:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Parish of St. Aidan’s filings →