Montreal-Ouest, QC · Charitable organization
Overcomers Assembly Inc.
We provided pastoral care.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRISON FELLOWSHIP OF CANADA | C$1,000 |
| NIGHTLIGHT CANADA | C$500 |
| SOURCE DE VIE POUR LES NATIONS | C$300 |
| MARCHE JESUS MONTREAL | C$300 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$800 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PFPRISON FELLOWSHIP CANADA7× · 2017–2024 · C$8k · revenue +74%
- LRLIFE RENEWAL CHARISMATIC CHURCH2× · 2018–2021 · C$4k · revenue +44%
- MEMinisteres Enseignemoi2× · 2018–2022 · C$3k · revenue +377%
Funded once
- ECECOLE CHRETIENNE EMMANUELone grant, 2022 · C$1k · revenue +13%
- PIPARTNERS IN MISSION FOOD BANKgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$500 · revenue +40%
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMY KINGSTON CITADEL CORPSone grant, 2022 · C$500 · revenue -3083%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Prédication évangélisation avancement de la réligion
Organiser administrer et maintenir une eglise evangelique dont l'objectif est la proclamation de l'évangile de jésus-christ.
Prêcher l'évangile de jésus-christ. organiser les activités chrétiennes. effectuer un travail missionnaire
Culte du dimanche matin étude biblique et prière les mercredis évangélisation travail pastoral des membres et des visiteurs
We preach the gospel of jesus christ. we train disciples of jesus christ. we provide support for believers.
Tenir et administrer une église évangélique
Cultes de dimanche Réunions de prières Accompagnement spirituel Évangélisations
Église chrétienne évangélique qui offre des cultes religieux principalement le dimanche de l'enseignement biblique et des oeuvres communautaires de bienfaisance.
Organiser administrer et maintenir une église évangélique de jésus-christ à tous les hommes.
Évangélisation
Enseignement des préceptes bibliques et prédicaiton de l'évangile de jésus-christ.
Culte évangélique biblique
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Renouvellement de vie Eglise Charismatique/Life Renewal Charismatic Church and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Mission Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP CANADA ↗
- Who funds LIFE RENEWAL CHARISMATIC CHURCH ↗
- Who funds Ministeres Enseignemoi ↗
- Who funds LION HEARTS INC ↗
- Who funds MARCHE JESUS MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds Martha's Table ↗
- Who funds ECOLE CHRETIENNE EMMANUEL ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN MISSION FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE SALVATION ARMY KINGSTON CITADEL CORPS ↗
- Who funds MEA CENTRE: PREGNANCY SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NIGHTLIGHT CANADA ↗
- Who funds Montreal West United Church ↗
- Who funds VISION CITADELLE ↗
- Who funds KINGSTON GOSPEL TEMPLE ↗
- Who funds SOURCE DE VIE POUR LES NATIONS ↗
- Who funds Ministere de Reveil Pour les Nations ↗
- Who funds Vases d'Honneur Montreal ↗
- Who funds Impact Centre Chretien ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Westside Fellowship Christian Reformed Church of Kingston · St. Mark's Anglican Church Barriefield · Catherine's Kitchen · The Free Methodist Church in Canada · Community Foundation for Kingston & Area · United Way of Kingston Frontenac Lennox & Addington · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · My Tribute Gift Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.