Skip to content

North Bay, ON · Public foundation

Our Lady of Sorrows Council No. 11584 Charitable Welfare Trust

Cash calendar sales / turkey bingo

C$7k
Granted FY2018
14
Grants FY2018
1
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2018 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$400
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$34k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Our Lady of Sorrows ChurchC$2,500
Nipissing Serenity HospitalC$1,000
Knights of Columbus - Ontario Charities FoundationC$680
West Nipissing Special OlympicsC$500
West Nipissing Food BankC$500
Sudbury Right to LifeC$500
Muscular DystrophyC$400
Nipissing First Nation BankC$200
Diane's Creative Elements (Knitted Knockers)C$200
Individual grant recipientC$100
Minor Bantam AA Trappers Golf SponsorC$100
LEglise St-Charles Borromee"C$80
Catholic Missions of CanadaC$50
Salt and Light MediaC$50
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$11k · 5 repeat orgsC$3k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

C$11k
C$900

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+139%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • OL
    Our Lady Of Sorrows Church
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$7k · revenue ×47 · 73% of their budget
  • WN
    West Nipissing Food Bank
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$1k · revenue +282%
  • SR
    Sudbury Right to Life
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$1k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • OL
    Our Lady of Sorrows Schoolgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$500 · revenue +139%
  • WN
    West Nipissing Knitting Circle
    one grant, 2017 · C$200
  • VQ
    Victoria's Quilts Canada
    one grant, 2017 · C$200 · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Niagara Foundation for Catholic Education

To provide financial support through the awarding of scholarships to elementary and secondary catholic schools within the jurisdiction of the niagara catholic district school board

—
2
Mcnally Hospice Foundation

Mcnally hospice foundation’s primary purpose is to receive and maintain funds to support palliative care in niagara west.

—
3
Victim Services of Nipissing District

Provide emergency crisis assistance to victims of crime tragic circumstances or disaster.

—
4
The Nargis Dutt Cancer Foundation

Provide medical equipment and related supplies to hospital and medical centres in india

—
5
Notre Dame Catholic School Council

Notre dame school council provides financial support through fundraising activities in the niagara falls area for the purpose of the establishment and administration of funds to be applied to activities programs and/or projects that…

—
6
North Oakville Catholic Knights Charities Inc.

Direct solicitations and acceptance of donations

—
7
Father Michael J. Mcgivney Honoris Charity Inc.

To promote the legacy and advance the case of father michael j. mcgivney and the knights of columbus

—
8
Ryan Saturno Patient Amenities Fund

Supporting families with children or young adults going through a current battle with a cancer related illness within ontario.

—
9
Niagara College Foundation
—
10
Catholic Schools Foundation of Nipissing-Parry Sound

Sponsors the family enrichment program that provides counselling and support to families who are stressed or inadequate physical and social personal resources as to improve their quality of life. also in efforts to strengthen the provinces…

—
11
Kc's Cancer Cushion Fund Trust

To provide financial and material relief to cancer patients in ontario's york region and simcoe county. to raise awareness among the general population about the finanial and emotional burdens faced by cancer patients.

—
12
The Catholic Education Foundation of the Huron-Superior Catholic District School Board

Foundation is engaged in fundraising and related activities for the purpose of providing the huron superior catholic district school board and other funding to the school board

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation for the Diocese of Sault Ste. Marie in Ontario Canada and the most unlike its peers is West Nipissing Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOur Lady Of Sorrows Church — C$7,000 over 2y, 73% of budgetWest Nipissing Food Bank — C$1,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetNipissing Serenity Hospital — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSudbury Right to Life — C$1,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetKnights of Columbus - Ontario Charities Foundation — C$975 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMuscular Dystrophy — C$700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOur Lady of Sorrows School — C$500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetVictoria's Quilts Canada — C$200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSalt and Light Media — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sisters of St Joseph of Sault Ste MarieON9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sisters of St Joseph of Sault Ste Marie · Sudbury #10888 Foundation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2018-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2018. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation.

Source object 870775715:2018-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Our Lady of Sorrows Council No. 11584 Charitable Welfare’s filings →