Verdun, QC · Charitable organization
Onward Gospel Church
Public service for worship and prayer christian education and instruction programs mission outreach on-lne livestream of worship service
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| POWER TO CHANGE MINISTRIES | C$5,500 |
| THE FAITH MISSION (IN CANADA) | C$4,500 |
| ONE HOPE MINISTRIES OF CANADA (QUEBEC) | C$3,000 |
| JUSQU'AUX EXTREMITES DE LA TERRE | C$2,700 |
| ISMC INTERNATIONAL STUDENT MINISTRIES | C$2,000 |
| THE BROOKHAVEN FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH | C$2,000 |
| CC MINISTRIES CANADA | C$1,500 |
| ONE HOPE MINISTRIES OF CANADA | C$1,200 |
| ISRAEL'S HOPE MINISTRIES OF CANADA | C$1,200 |
| ASSOCIATED GOSPEL CHURCHES | C$1,000 |
| OUR DAILY BREAD MINISTRIES CANADA | C$400 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- OHONE HOPE MINISTRIES OF CANADA7× · 2017–2024 · C$48k · revenue +107% · 55% of their budget
- TFTHE FAITH MISSION (IN CANADA)7× · 2017–2024 · C$37k · revenue +22%
- PTPOWER TO CHANGE MINISTRIES7× · 2017–2024 · C$36k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- TSTHE SAMARITAN'S PURSE - CANADAgraduatedone grant, 2021 · C$500 · revenue +35%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…
Missionary trainings On-line and On-site mission trips Church planting trainings
To bring Christianity to places that have not been reached as of yet and to train young people to do the same.
Missions/evangelism
Our aim is to create God-honouring transformation in communities where He is not worshiped. We prepare and train our workers and volunteers to establish groups of Christ followers in areas where there are presently none both within and…
Preaching the gospel through broadcasting TV programs Printed publications Emergency Relief Media evangelism Campaigns
Conducts missionary work in the developing countries
Promulgation of the gospel of jesus christ maily through media
Preach the gospel and bible teaching through the support of missions and ministries in canada and tanzania
Missionary training -bible studies
Prédication évangélisation avancement de la réligion
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Faith Mission (in Canada) and the most unlike its peers is The Brookhaven Foundation for Youth / Fondation Jeunesse Brookhaven. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ONE HOPE MINISTRIES OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds THE FAITH MISSION (IN CANADA) ↗
- Who funds POWER TO CHANGE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED GOSPEL CHURCHES ↗
- Who funds ISMC INTERNATIONAL STUDENT MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKHAVEN FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds UFM INTERNATIONAL IN CANADA ↗
- Who funds JUSQU'AUX EXTREMITES DE LA TERRE (JET) ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL'S HOPE MINISTRIES OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds OUR DAILY BREAD MINISTRIES CANADA ↗
- Who funds Pregnancy Counselling Centre ↗
- Who funds CC MINISTRIES CANADA ↗
- Who funds THE SAMARITAN'S PURSE - CANADA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.