Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Peterborough, ON · Charitable organization

Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters Foundation

The OFAH continued its outreach education and communication of fish wildlife and conservation issues through our communications vehicles including Ontario Out of Doors magazine Angler & Hunter TV over thirty program websites and social media; province wide Invading Species initiatives (educational material development and…

C$139k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$14k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k10 grants · C$53k
  • C$10k–50k7 grants · C$86k
C$7,020
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METRO EAST ANGLERS INCC$14,275
Sydenham Sportsmen's AssocC$13,943
NORTH HASTINGS COMMUNITY FISH HATCHERYC$12,650
Haliburton Highlands Outdoors AssocC$12,200
Bruce Peninsula Sportsmen's AssocC$12,000
Kincardine Trout HatcheryC$11,000
BLUEWATER ANGLERSC$10,000
Lake Erie Salmon and Trout ClubC$8,500
Georgian Triangle Anglers AssocC$7,020
Chelmsford Fish and Game AssocC$6,800
Me-Me-Sagamesing Pickerel HatcheryC$6,500
Little Current & District Fish & Game ClubC$6,000
Trailsmen Hatchery and Rearing PondsC$6,000
Thunder Bay Salmon AssocC$5,000
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITYC$2,624
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.3M · 15 repeat orgsC$195k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
23

Total granted

C$1.3M
C$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+40%

Still filing today

93%
96%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
    6× · 2018–2024 · C$985k · revenue +51%
  • NH
    NORTH HASTING COMMUNITY FISH HATCHERY
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$79k · revenue +39% · 29% of their budget
  • BA
    BLUEWATER ANGLERS
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$74k · revenue +56% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • KC
    KINARK CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES
    one grant, 2018 · C$26k · revenue -3%
  • GR
    GANARASKA REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITYgraduated
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$24k · revenue +42%
  • M
    Manitoulin
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hamilton Region Conservation Authority

Recreational trails and activities such as camping and boating protecting people and property from flooding and erosion acquire lands for greenspace operate outdoor education programs

—
2
Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority

Central lake ontario conservation authority's mission is to work towards the awareness understanding wise use and enhancement of our watershed resources for the benefit of the natural environment in partnership with our municipalities and…

—
3
Lower Trent Region Conservation Authority

Communicate with municipalities/residents to increase public awareness & provide advice on env. issues; own over 3800 acres of natural open space which we protect & manage for present & future generations; youth education programs; work…

—
4
Upper Thames River Conservation Authority

We achieve our goals through myriad programs which take a holistic ecosystem approach. The UTRCA's 'ends' are to: protect life and property from flood and erosion protect and improve water quality preserve and manage natural areas provide…

—
5
Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority

The npca administers programs to further the conservation restoration and development of lands within its geographical juridiction

—
6
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority

To provide leadership in the protection and restoration of the environmental health and quality of Lake Simcoe and its watershed with our community municipal and other government partners. Provide technical and educational services. The…

—
7
Essex Region Conservation Authority

The core mandate of conservation authorities is to undertake watershed-based programs (mandatory and non-mandatory) to protect people and property from flooding and other natural hazards and to conserve natural resources orr economic…

—
8
Sackville Rivers Association

The sra is involved in a number of projects ranging from fish habitat restoration to education trail development and water quality monitoring. our efforts are concentrated on protecting and restoring fish habitat through stream…

—
9
Freshwater Conservation Canada

Freshwater conservation canada is committed to conserving protecting and restoring canada's freshwater ecosystems and their coldwater resources for current and future generations. programs and projects are delivered by our professional…

—
10
Heartland Forest Nature Experience

Environmental projects designed to preserve and protect flora and fauna; environmental projects designed to preserve protect and restore rivers; environmental projects to improve the urban environment educational programs to increase the…

—
11
Niagara Peninsula Conservation Foundation

Ongoing programs the npca administers programs to further the conservation restoration and development of lands within its geographical jurisdiction

—
12
The North Bay-Mattawa Conservation Authority

Manages a program designed to further the conversation restoration development and management of natural resources other than gas oil coal and minerals in the north bay - mattawa area.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Halton Region Conservation Authority and the most unlike its peers is Rotary Club of Ingersoll Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
27/37
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY — C$984,682 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH HASTING COMMUNITY FISH HATCHERY — C$78,924 over 8y, 29% of budgetBLUEWATER ANGLERS — C$74,071 over 8y, 30% of budgetMETRO EAST ANGLERS INC — C$58,235 over 6y, 36% of budgetCONSERVATION HALTON — C$27,790 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTEMAGAMI AREA FISH INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM — C$26,446 over 8y, 33% of budgetKINARK CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — C$26,310 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGANARASKA REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY — C$24,095 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFORESTS ONTARIO — C$20,440 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetManitoulin — C$10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetALUS CANADA — C$7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHAMES RIVER ANGLERS ASSOCIATION — C$7,405 over 4y, 35% of budgetRomuva Incorporated — C$7,333 over 1y, 13% of budgetOntario Streams — C$5,226 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFriends Of Hullett — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetGeorgian Bay Forever — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLONG POINT PROVINICIAL PARK — C$4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC EDUCATION TRUST FUND OF SIMCOE COUNTY/MUSKOKA — C$3,795 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCAMP KAWARTHA — C$3,578 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPETERBOROUGH GREEN UP — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HALTON REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY — C$1,920 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRARE CHARITABLE RESEARCH RESERVE — C$937 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE SIMCOE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION — C$700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF INGERSOLL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — C$650 over 1y, 33% of budgetMISSISSIPPI VALLEY CONSERVATION — C$633 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN WILDLIFE FEDERATION — C$600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOAK RIDGES MORAINE LAND TRUST — C$500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSIERRA CLUB CANADA FOUNDATION — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOAK RIDGES MORAINLAND TRUST — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREINDS OF SECOND MARSH — C$500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRouge Valley Foundation — C$355 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKAWARTHA FOODSHARE — C$322 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Safe Boating Council — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKINGSTON FIELD NATURALISTS — C$200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFORT ERIE CONSEVATION CLUB — C$121 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Td Friends of the Env…Ontario Wildlife Foun…Greenbelt FoundationFondation Écho /Echo …The McLean FoundationHelen McCrea Peacock …Nature Canada / Canad…World Wildlife Fund C…The Gosling FoundationCommunity Foundation …Toronto FoundationOntario Power Generat…
Td Friends of the Environment FoundationON18.1× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Td Friends of the Environment Foundation · Ontario Wildlife Foundation · Greenbelt Foundation · Fondation Écho /Echo Foundation · The McLean Foundation · Helen McCrea Peacock Foundation · Nature Canada / Canada Nature · World Wildlife Fund Canada Fonds Mondial Pour la Nature Can Ada · The Gosling Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Peterborough · Toronto Foundation · Ontario Power Generation Employees' and Pensioners' Charity Trust Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under animal welfare.

Source object 118913904:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters’ filings →