Milton, ON · Charitable organization
Omagh Church of Christ
Preaching & teaching the gospel & christian principles to congregation - weekly financial support of mission & benevolent work collection of food items for local food bank - weekly support of 3 poor children overseas through world vision
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| World Vision | C$1,764 |
| Omagh Bible School | C$1,100 |
| Strathmore Blvd Church of Christ | C$1,005 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against -13% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- WVWorld Vision Canada8× · 2017–2024 · C$14k · revenue +6%
- SBStrathmore Blvd Church of Christ7× · 2017–2024 · C$10k · revenue +16%
- OBOMAGH BIBLE SCHOOL7× · 2017–2024 · C$7k · revenue +141%
Funded once
- SBStrathmore Blvd Church of Christone grant, 2023 · C$5k
- SESouth Edmonton Church of Christone grant, 2018 · C$1k
- BCBromalea Church of Christone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue -13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Sunday worship service & Bible classes Wednesday evening Bible study
Normal church activities
Worship sservice bible classes and life groups for studying the bible. various programs for children youth men women. food donations to local food and soup kitchens. assist with the needs of our community.
Gospel preaching and religious education of congregation. spiritual counseling and christian fellowship. weekly bible studies. sunday school classes for children and adults.
1. Advanced and taught the religious tenets doctrines observances and culture associated with the Christian faith 2. Established maintained and supported a house of worship with services conducted in accordance with the tenets and…
We hold weekly Sunday worship service and weekly Wednesday Bible studies. We have free bible courses made available to the public.
We hold worship services weekly. . We provide pastoral care. We contribute to the local food bank monthly. We provide a spiritual based seminar involving the community on a periodic basis. We provide support for widows/widowers and…
Preaching & teaching the gospel & christian principles to congregation - weekly financial support of mission & benevolent work collection of food items for local food bank - weekly support of 3 poor children overseas through world vision
Conducted church activities such as bible teaching in the congregation study classes provide a place to worship teaching and missions supported with christian encouragement children's & youth program based on biblical teaching bible small…
Church
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Strathmore Church of Christ and the most unlike its peers is Great Lakes Bible College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Church of Christ-Bramalea · Beamsville Church of Christ · Vandeleur Church of Christ · Church of Christ · Southwest Kitchener church of Christ · Campbell River Church of Christ · My Tribute Gift Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.