Foothills, AB · Charitable organization
Okotoks Alliance Church
Pastoral work and pastoral care; youth work; mission functions; moms; womens & mens programs; implementing christian ministries inand around the community of okotoks alberta
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHRISTIAN & MISSIONARY ALLIANCE | C$4,160 |
| YOUTH WITH A MISSION | C$3,300 |
| POWER AT WORK MINISTRIES | C$2,500 |
| CHRISTIAN & MISSIONARY ALLIANCE | C$2,000 |
| AMBROSE UNIVERSITY | C$2,000 |
| OKOTOKS FOOD BANK | C$1,200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- YWYOUTH WITH A MISSION8× · 2017–2024 · C$39k · revenue +20%
- HMHELLENIC MINISTRIES6× · 2019–2024 · C$20k · revenue +135%
- AUAMBROSE UNIVERISTY COLLEGE LTD.8× · 2017–2024 · C$16k · revenue +80%
Funded once
- FCFoothils Country Hospiceone grant, 2018 · C$150 · revenue +25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Training for christian ministry through undergraduate and graduate training.
Alberta bible college is a post secondary educational institution awarding four-year degrees two-year diplomas and one-year certificates in christian ministries. a two-year degree completion program in christian leadership or counselling…
Graduate level theological education
Missionary trainings On-line and On-site mission trips Church planting trainings
Through post-secondary education programs columbia bible college equips people for a life of discipleship ministry and leadership in service to the church and community. programs include one-year certificates two-year diplomas and bachelor…
MB Seminary provides graduate theological education to students from the Mennonite Brethren Christian tradition. MB Seminary provides seminars and leadership development courses to students from the viewpoint of the Mennonite Brethren…
Broadcasting and distribution of educational materials to present and teach christian faith. charis bible college - educating individuals to be better equipped to proclaim the truth of the gospel through the world.
Missionary training -bible studies
Kingswood University is accredited through the Commission on Accreditation of the Association for Biblical Higher Education (ABHE) and provides a number of educational options including 3-4 year baccalaureate degrees focused on vocational…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth With a Mission (Bc) Society and the most unlike its peers is Ambrose University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.