Montreal, QC · Charitable organization
Oeuvres Et Missions Don Bosco
Solliciter des fonds afin d'aider nos oeuvres en pays de missions à travers le monde ainsi qu'au canada.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LA SOCIÉTÉ DES SALÉSIENS DU CANADA | C$68,295 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TWTHE WARE AMPUTATINS OF CANADA2× · 2017–2019 · C$55 · revenue +30%
- MMMARRY MOTHER OF GOD SCHOOL2× · 2017–2019 · C$55 · revenue +8%
- CMCATHOLIC MISSIONS IN CANADA2× · 2017–2019 · C$51 · revenue +10%
Funded once
- HSHOREB SAINT-JACQUESone grant, 2018 · C$120 · revenue -19%
- TFTHE FABRIQUE OF THE PARISH OF ST VERONICAone grant, 2017 · C$35 · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LA SOCIÉTÉ DES SALÉSIENS DU CANADA ↗
- Who funds HOREB SAINT-JACQUES ↗
- Who funds THE WARE AMPUTATINS OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds MARRY MOTHER OF GOD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC MISSIONS IN CANADA ↗
- Who funds OUR LADY SEAT OF WISDOM ACADEMY FOR STUDIES IN CHRISTIAN CUL ↗
- Who funds THE FABRIQUE OF THE PARISH OF ST VERONICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.