Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Winnipeg, MB · Charitable organization

Oasis Community Church Inc.

Weekly worship services pastoral care ministry to children ministry to youth support to missions & rehabilitation organization fellowship ministry & care for sick & needy teaching counselling services children's activities

C$284k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$274k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$11k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$274k
C$273,668
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VILLAGES OF HOPEC$273,668
WORLD VISION CANADAC$10,699
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.1M · 3 repeat orgsC$655 to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

C$1.1M
C$655

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+27%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • VO
    VILLAGES OF HOPE
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$1.0M · revenue +40%
  • WV
    WORLD VISION CANADA
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$33k · revenue +7%
  • IJ
    INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION CANADA
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$6k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • SM
    SILOAM MISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$345 · revenue +56%
  • SP
    Samaritan's Pursegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$300 · revenue +26%
  • FD
    Family Dynamicsgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$10 · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
6/6
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVILLAGES OF HOPE — C$1,024,138 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetWORLD VISION CANADA — C$32,672 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION CANADA — C$5,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSILOAM MISSION — C$345 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSamaritan's Purse — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Dynamics — C$10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 102541786:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Oasis Community Church’s filings →