Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Abbotsford, BC · Private foundation

O.J. Jacobson Foundation

To fund and promote educational programs and activities to aid medical work; to fund and promote environmental concerns; to receive gifts bequests funds and property; to hold invest administer and distribute funds on property for purposes of the foundation and for such other organizations that are 'qualified donees' and for such…

C$627k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$552k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$75k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$552k
C$30,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$554k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNTAINVIEW ACADEMY ASSOCIATIONC$552,000
ASI MISSIONS CANADA FOUNDATIONC$30,000
CHIMP: CHARITABLE IMPACT FOUNDATION (CANADA)C$25,000
FAIRHAVEN FARM ASSOCIATIONC$20,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$3.3M · 4 repeat orgsC$370k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +1143% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

C$3.3M
C$325k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1143%
+26%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    FOUNTAINVIEW ACADEMY ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$3.0M · revenue +42% · 28% of their budget
  • FS
    FOUNTAINVIEW SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH
    3× · 2017–2023 · C$192k · revenue ×1,061
  • AM
    ASI MISSIONS CANADA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2024 · C$34k · revenue ×12

Funded once

  • AU
    ANDREWS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · C$170k
  • LL
    LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · C$129k
  • BL
    BETTER LIVING MINISTRY
    one grant, 2018 · C$19k · revenue -92%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fraser Valley Adventist Academy

Fraser valley adventist academy (fvaa) provides a complete program of christian education for k-12 students who are willing to adhere to the philosophy and objectives of fvaa. the program includes the provision of the physical plant and…

—
2
Fca Leadership Training Scholarship Fund

Granted scholarships to students attending christian colleges or bible schools

—
3
The Alberta Conference of the Seventh-Day Adventist Church

To offer a balance quality christian education for children in kindergarten to grade 9 that incorporates physical mental moral social and vocational components: and embraces seventh-day adventist deminational standards and ideals…

—
4
Child Aid International Fund Society

Making Gifts to Qualified Donees

—
5
Giftpact Foundation Inc.

The objective of the Foundation is to increase philanthropy through the introduction and management of donor advised funds. Donor advised funds are restricted funds managed by the Foundation that give certain advisory rights to donors. The…

—
6
Global Scholars Canada

The mission of global scholars canada is to identify develop send equip and support missional christian academics for work primarily in open enrollment post secondary institutions around the world with the objective to inspire and…

—
7
Canadian Alternative Investment Foundation

Provide low interest loss to registered charities and grants to registered charities.

—
8
Lakeview Academy Association

Christian school providing education for pre primary up to grade 6.

—
9
Lifestyle Ministires International

During 2024 the charity focused on its christian missionary mandate by teaching and giving leadership and financial support to christian church planters supporting education for those in extreme poverty feeding the hungry supporting…

—
10
Fraser Institute Foundation

To provide a medium for charitable gifts donations and bequests. Manage endowment funds to provide support for the Fraser Institute and other similar organizations whose primary intent is to study and communicate the impact of economic…

—
11
First Lutheran Christian Academy

Operates a christian school

—
12
Amazing Facts Ministries Inc.

Religious television programming

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seventh-Day Adventist Church in Canada and the most unlike its peers is Fairhaven Farm Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFOUNTAINVIEW ACADEMY ASSOCIATION — C$3,043,080 over 8y, 28% of budgetFOUNTAINVIEW SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH — C$192,482 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetASI MISSIONS CANADA FOUNDATION — C$33,798 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetCHIMP: CHARITABLE IMPACT FOUNDATION (CANADA) — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFESTYLER ADVANTAGE INSTITUTE — C$21,300 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetFAIRHAVEN FARM ASSOCIATION — C$20,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetBETTER LIVING MINISTRY — C$18,712 over 1y, 11% of budgetSEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH IN CANADA — C$7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

CHIMP: Charitable Imp…Canadahelps Canadon
CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)BC4.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 862425790:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on O.J. Jacobson’s filings →