Skip to content
Canadian charities

Kamsack, SK · Private foundation

Nykolaishen Family Foundation Inc.

The foundation will not be engaging in any specific programming activities.

C$62k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
2
Regions reached
C$24k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$7k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$54k
C$10,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$266k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASSINIBOINE VALLEY HEALTH & WELLNESS FOUNDATIONC$24,250
TOWN OF KAMSACKC$20,000
GOOD SPIRIT SCHOOL DIVISIONC$10,000
ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE OF CENTRAL CANADAC$5,000
JAX MAC FOUNDATION CORP.C$2,000
SASKABILITIESC$300
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$118k · 3 repeat orgsC$123k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

C$118k
C$106k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+18%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    TOWN OF KAMSACK
    4× · 2018–2023 · C$49k
  • AV
    ASSINIBOINE VALLEY HEALTH & WELLNESS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$42k · revenue +19%
  • SJ
    St. Josaphat Ukranian Catholic Church
    3× · 2017–2020 · C$28k · revenue -43%

Funded once

  • SU
    ST.MICHAEL'S UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC CHURCH CAMP INC.graduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$50k · revenue +136% · 31% of their budget
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MADGE LAKE DUCK MOUNTAIN PARK INC.
    one grant, 2021 · C$45k · revenue -26% · 46% of their budget
  • EL
    EAGLESTONE LODGE PERSONAL CARE HOMEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue +38%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Huron Handicapped Services Inc.

Provide accommodation and services to individuals with developmental challenges.

—
2
Ukrainian Cath Episc Corp of Sask Holy Eucharist Church

Providing the facilities staffing and management necessary to the enjoyment of worship.

—
3
Ukrainian Catholic Episcopal Corporation All Saints Ukrainia

Ukrainian catholic religious organization

—
4
St. Joseph's Hospital of Macklin
—
5
Camp Tamarack Association

Hall rentals camp rentals catering summer camp programs and programs for the physically mentally challenged.

—
6
Ukrainian Catholic Parish of Holy Ascension

Ukrainian catholic church and cemetery servicing the area of winnepegosis mb.

—
7
St. Michael's Ukrainian Catholic Parish

Organize and provide religious education worship and instruction. provide pastoral and ministry work. provide and maintain buildings for worship and other religious and community use.

—
8
St Demetrius (Ukrainian Catholic) Development Corporation

To provide appropriate living accommodation for seniors and long term care nursing care and understanding and undertake problems of the elderly

—
9
Descent of the Holy Spirit Ukrainian Catholic Parish Waskatenau

Maintain and Preserve rural church and cemetery for the members of the congregation

—
10
St. Joseph's Ukrainian Catholic Church
—
11
Camp St. Basil

Provide and maintain building and facility for youth and religious camp. provide all year caretaker for the camp

—
12
Ukrainian Catholic Parish of Sacred Heart of Jesus

Advancement of spiritual teachings of the ukrainian catholic church at sacred heart parish. maintain the buildings facilities and grounds that are used for the religious and spiritual needs of parishioners. support the clergy who serve the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St. Michael's Ukrainian Catholic Church Camp Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Madge Lake Duck Mountain Park Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST.MICHAEL'S UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC CHURCH CAMP INC. — C$50,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetFRIENDS OF MADGE LAKE DUCK MOUNTAIN PARK INC. — C$45,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetASSINIBOINE VALLEY HEALTH & WELLNESS FOUNDATION — C$41,500 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetSt. Josaphat Ukranian Catholic Church — C$27,500 over 3y, 21% of budgetGOOD SPIRIT SCHOOL DIVISION — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE OF CENTRAL CANADA — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLESTONE LODGE PERSONAL CARE HOME — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUKRAINIAN CATHOLIC CHURCH — C$5,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetJAX MAC FOUNDATION CORP. — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHuntington Society of Canada — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSASKABILITIES — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligneAB1.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 765464490:2023-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Nykolaishen Family’s filings →