Fort St. John, BC · Charitable organization
Not by Might Ministries
Weekly worship services.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k9 grants · C$23k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIRST CENTURY FOUNDATIONS | C$19,546 |
| YOUTH WITH A MISSION | C$7,200 |
| SUNRISE RADIO | C$3,600 |
| EMBLAZE MINISTRIES | C$3,000 |
| V-KOL MEDIA MINISTRIES | C$2,400 |
| COLUMBIA PARA CRISTO SOCIETY | C$2,400 |
| LIGHT AND SALT MINISTRIES | C$1,800 |
| NATIONAL HOUSE OF PRAYER | C$1,600 |
| NORTH PEACE PREGNANCY CENTRE | C$600 |
| KINGS VALLEY CHRISTIAN CAMP | C$600 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- FCFIRST CENTURY FOUNDATIONS6× · 2017–2024 · C$48k · revenue +72%
- YWYOUTH WITH A MISSION4× · 2020–2024 · C$29k · revenue +14%
- SRSUNRISE RADIO7× · 2017–2024 · C$26k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- ACACT Canadagraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$1k · revenue +308%
- JHJoyful House of Prayerone grant, 2018 · C$1k · revenue -12%
- BFBRIDGES FOR PEACEone grant, 2022 · C$820 · revenue +13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Revive nations is a ministry with a passion to raise jesus lovers across the world and on a mission to win souls for jesus touching nations one life at a time.
Kingdom culture ministries is an international ministry that is dedicated to bringing the delivering power of jesus christ throughout north america and abroad. to that end ministry personnel preached the gospel in churches conferences &…
Training qualified leaders from around world to effectively evangelize other national christians.
Church services programs television ministry (living truth) and global missions
Missionary and teaching the word and spirit message in liberia isreal and dominica with employees and volunteers.
Evangelical ministry
Bible studies prayer meetings
Broadcasting individual and group teaching
Men's ministry women's ministry prayer meetings group bible study community outreach leadership trainings praise and worship trainings
At the cross ministries operates a television ministry to reach those who are lost and hurting with the gospel of jesus christ in the early morning hours.
Bible education recovery ministry prayer ministry missions to africa pakistan india
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ahava Life Centre Fellowship and Ministries and the most unlike its peers is North Peace Pregnancy Care Centre Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FIRST CENTURY FOUNDATIONS ↗
- Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE RADIO ↗
- Who funds Kings Valley Christian Camp ↗
- Who funds EMBLAZE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds V-KOL MEDIA MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA PARA CRISTO SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH ↗
- Who funds AGAPE LIFE CENTER CHURCH ↗
- Who funds Light & Salt Ministries ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTRE ↗
- Who funds NEW DAY IN THE PEACE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds NORTH PEACE PREGNANCY CENTRE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HOUSE OF PRAYER ↗
- Who funds ACT Canada ↗
- Who funds Joyful House of Prayer ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES FOR PEACE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Peace Lutheran Church · Cecil Lake Christian Fellowship · The Well - a Gathering Place (Fellowship) · Link Charity Canada Inc · Abundance Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Canadahelps Canadon · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.