Brockville, ON · Charitable organization
North Augusta Pastoral Charge
Weekly church services pastoral care/visitation
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA | C$1,766 |
| WORLD VISION | C$540 |
| MAYNARD PUBLIC SCHOOL | C$250 |
| PRESCOTT FOOD BANK | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UCUnited Church of Canada6× · 2017–2023 · C$18k
- WVWORLD VISION4× · 2021–2024 · C$2k · revenue +6%
- WVWORLD VISION4× · 2017–2020 · C$2k
Funded once
- HOHOUSE OF LAZARUSone grant, 2019 · C$300
- HOHouse of Lazarusgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$275 · revenue +191%
- FFFood For Allone grant, 2017 · C$200
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.