Skip to content
Canadian charities

Thornhill, ON · Private foundation

Norman Feder Charitable Foundation

Distributes income and capital to 'qualified donees' and for scholarships.

C$356
Granted FY2020
6
Grants FY2020
1
Regions reached
C$126
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$54
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CANADIAN ZIONIST CULTURAL ASSOCIATIONC$126
DISABLED VETERANS OF ISRAELC$54
EMUNAH CANADAC$54
HACHNOSAS KALLAHC$50
BIKUR CHOLIMC$36
MIZRACHI ORGANIZATION OF CANADAC$36
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

24%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$3k · 9 repeat orgsC$11k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

C$3k
C$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+37%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OD GREATHER TORONTO
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$2k · revenue +98%
  • TC
    THE CANADIAN ZIONIST CULTURAL ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$284 · revenue +38%
  • EC
    EMUNAH CANADA
    3× · 2018–2020 · C$198 · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • VZ
    VMM ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY
    one grant, 2017 · C$7k
  • NF
    NE'EMAN FOUNDATION CANADA
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue -20%
  • ST
    SHAAREI TEFILLAH CONGREGATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$625 · revenue +68%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
Kehilas Tosh

To provide financial assistance to needy people in difficult situations. to provide scholarships to qualified students

—
3
Reb Mayer Baal Hanes - Chibas Jerusalem

Providing scholarships to poor and low income students in israel.

—
4
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
5
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
6
Agudas Tomchei Nachal Novea Charitable Organization

The charity provides scholarships

—
7
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—
8
Chasdei Levy Yitzcok

To relieve poverty by providing reasonable financial means for food shelter and other supplies or services to needy persons in israel

—
9
Ozer Israel

The organization donates and lends money to individuals in need

—
10
Gemach Zichron Burech Zvi

Provide interest free benevolent loans to needy and to qualified donees

—
11
Tzivos Hashem Canada Inc

Providing educational programs for adults youth and children in Toronto Operating 3 synagogues Providing family counselling services

—
12
Tikvah L'Chaim/Tzohar

To sponser religious education and seminars. to support poor famalies.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mizrachi Organization of Canada and the most unlike its peers is Hatzoloh Toronto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNE'EMAN FOUNDATION CANADA — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL OD GREATHER TORONTO — C$2,070 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHAAREI TEFILLAH CONGREGATION — C$625 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CANADIAN ZIONIST CULTURAL ASSOCIATION — C$284 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEMUNAH CANADA — C$198 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIZRACHI ORGANISATION OF CANADA — C$180 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION AYIN L'TZION — C$180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHACHNOSAS KALLAH — C$158 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM — C$144 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILD SERVICE OF GREATER TORONTO — C$136 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDISABLED VETERANS OF ISRAEL — C$108 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHATZOLOH TORONTO — C$85 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEZRAS CHOLIM ORGANIZATION — C$72 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD LUBAVITCH — C$18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Rayjo Charitable Trust
Rayjo Charitable TrustON8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rayjo Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2020-11-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2020. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2022) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 119058774:2020-11-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Norman Feder’s filings →