Skip to content
Canadian charities

Nokomis, SK · Public foundation

Nokomis & District Combined Appeal Donors Choice Committee

C$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$715
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$100
Median grant
2
Regions reached
—
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOKOMIS RECREATION CENTREC$715
Individual grant recipientC$695
HEART AND STROKE FOUNDATIONC$640
STARS FOUNDATIONC$400
CANCER FOUNDATION OF SASKATCHEWANC$390
NOKOMIS HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATIONC$290
NOKOMIS AGRICULTURE SOCIETYC$275
NOKOMIS AND DISTRICT MUSEUMC$270
SASKATOON BURN UNITC$200
MS SOCIETY OF CANADAC$165
CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETYC$150
THE ARTHRITIS SOCIETYC$115
ALS SOCIETY OF SASKC$100
LUNG ASSOCIATION OF SASKATCHEWANC$65
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY CANADC$50
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$33k · 40 repeat orgsC$3k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
10

Total granted

C$33k
C$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+39%

Still filing today

57%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$115 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HEART AND STROKE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +17%
  • NH
    NOKOMIS HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$2k · revenue +136% · 59% of their budget
  • SF
    STARS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$2k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • NR
    NOKOMIS RECREATION CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · C$810
  • ND
    NOKOMIS + DISTRICT MUSEUM
    one grant, 2022 · C$580
  • CF
    CANCER FOUNDATION OF SASKATCHEWAN
    one grant, 2021 · C$565

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation

We run funding competitions that provide: 1. Grants to new university faculty members to start their health research programs; 2. Grants for advanced research training in health areas;; 3. Support for Researchers to exchange ideas and work…

—
2
Saskatchewan Cancer Agency

The saskatchewan cancer agency provided leadership in cancer control for the people of saskatchewan through prevention early detection treatment and research

—
3
Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc.

Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc. provides funding through donations to the Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) and other agencies to improve healthcare for the residents of Southern Saskatchewan. The donations assist these agencies in…

—
4
Saskatchewan Health Authority

The Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) is responsible for the delivery of high quality and timely health care for all the people across the province. The SHA has approximately 40 000 employees and 2 770 physicians who provide services to…

—
5
Scleroderma Association of Saskatchewan

We provide information and support to Scleroderma patients and their families. We promote awareness of Scleroderma to Doctors and the general public. We raise money for medical research of Scleroderma. We provide money for Scleroderma…

—
6
Saskatoon Regional Health Authority

We operate a health delivery system providing a full range of health care services to residents of the Saskatoon Health Region and other residents of Saskatchewan. Services are provided in hospitals, long-term care facilities, primary…

—
7
The Hospital for Sick Children Foundation

SickKids Foundation has been inspiring our communities since 1972 to invest in improving the lives of children and their families. Donor support is a critical source of funding for the Hospital for Sick Children and in recent years has…

—
8
The Royal Alexandra Hospital Foundation

The Royal Alexandra Hospital Foundation raises and manages funds to advance and support the Royal Alexandra Hospital Alberta Health Services and post-secondary institutions in Edmonton Alberta. Enhancement includes the funding of equipment…

—
9
Moose Jaw Health Foundation Incorporated

The foundation assists with fundign shortfalls of the capital equipment for the dr fh wigmore regional hospital and the saskatchewan health authority. the foundation supports training and development of health care staff.

—
10
University of Saskatchewan

The University of Saskatchewan's primary role is to provide post-secondary instruction and research in humanities sciences and other areas of human intellectual cultural social and physical development. The University offers instructional…

—
11
Red Deer Regional Health Foundation

Red deer regional health foundation (rdrhf) raises and disburses funds for program services and the purchase of medical equipment for the red deer regional hospital centre (rdrhc) and other facilities in alberta health services (ahs)…

—
12
South Country Health Care Foundation Inc

South country health care foundation raises money through donations and fund raising and subsequently grants funds to various capital projects in the south country area of saskatchewan on basis of needs.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cancer Foundation of Saskatchewan Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Nokomis United Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/28
Grantees still filing
20/28
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNOKOMIS RECREATION CENTRE — C$3,095 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetHEART AND STROKE FOUNDATION — C$2,680 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNOKOMIS HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION — C$2,075 over 7y, 59% of budgetSTARS FOUNDATION — C$2,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWHEATLAND LIBRARY — C$1,680 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY — C$1,295 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY — C$1,265 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNOKOMIS AGRICULTURE SOCIETY — C$1,080 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetLUNG ASSOCIATION OF SASKATCHEWAN — C$905 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER FOUNDATION OF SASKATCHEWAN — C$870 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Foundation — C$770 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER SOCIETY OF SK — C$650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARTHRITIS SOCIETY — C$620 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMS SOCIETY OF CANADA — C$610 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S COLITIS CANADA — C$500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNOKOMIS UNITED CHURCH — C$495 over 4y, 23% of budgetCANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION — C$460 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSASKATOON BURN UNIT — C$450 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNOKOMIS ANGLICAN CHURCH — C$225 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCANADIAN WISH FOUNDATION — C$160 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY CANAD — C$160 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLung Association of Saskatchewan — C$130 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALS SOCIETY OF SASK — C$100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHY'S PLACE (INTERLAKE) — C$70 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE SASKATCHEWAN — C$60 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP EAST SEAL - SK ABILITIES COUNCIL — C$60 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSASKATCHEWAN BURN UNIT — C$35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL — C$20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NOKOMIS RECREATION CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds HEART AND STROKE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NOKOMIS HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WHEATLAND LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds THE SALVATION ARMY ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NOKOMIS AGRICULTURE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LUNG ASSOCIATION OF SASKATCHEWAN ↗
  • Who funds CANCER FOUNDATION OF SASKATCHEWAN ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER SOCIETY OF SK ↗
  • Who funds THE ARTHRITIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MS SOCIETY OF CANADA ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S COLITIS CANADA ↗
  • Who funds NOKOMIS UNITED CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SASKATOON BURN UNIT ↗
  • Who funds NOKOMIS ANGLICAN CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN WISH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY CANAD ↗
  • Who funds Lung Association of Saskatchewan ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Saskato…Milestone Donors Choi…Duval Annual Combined…United Way of ReginaBredenbury and Distri…Abernethy and Distric…Craik and District Do…Gull Lake & District …Naicam & District Com…Lashburn & District C…Sasktel Telcare Emplo…Saskatchewan Communit…
United Way of Saskatoon and AreaSK10.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Saskatoon and Area · Milestone Donors Choice Combined Appeal · Duval Annual Combined Appeal · United Way of Regina · Bredenbury and District Combined Appeal Donors Choice · Abernethy and District Donors Choice · Craik and District Donor's Choice Appeal · Gull Lake & District Donors Choice Appeal · Naicam & District Combined Appeal Donors Choice · Lashburn & District Combined Appeal Donors Choice · Sasktel Telcare Employees Charity Trust · Saskatchewan Community Foundation Corp.

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 119058444:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Nokomis & District Combined Appeal Donors Choice Committee’s filings →