Skip to content

Nipawin, SK · Charitable organization

Nipawin Senior Citizens Association Inc.

To provide a building for recreation + social activities for seniors + others including billiards shuffleboard cards dancing potluck suppers catered meals fundraisers meals weekly bingo + nevada nights fundraisers staffed by volunteers.

C$100
Granted FY2020
2
Grants FY2020
1
Regions reached
C$50
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$50
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$39k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION-NIPAWIN BRANCHC$50
NIPAWIN AND DISTRICT SERVICES TO THE HANDICAPPEDC$50
02Your field
02the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 5 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRoyal Canadian Legion — C$240 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNipawin and District Services to the Handicapped — C$200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKinsman Foundation - Telemiracle — C$125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNipawin Oasis Centre — C$125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2020-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2020. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under relief of the aged.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 119058022:2020-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Nipawin Senior Citizens Association’s filings →