Nipawin, SK · Charitable organization
Nipawin Bible College
Bible college - training students for ministry through classroom instruction and practical experience in churches camps and missions
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHRISTAR | C$500 |
| THE REFUGE MISSION FOUNDATION | C$200 |
| ADEARA RECOVERY CENTRE | C$200 |
| THE MUSTARD SEED | C$200 |
| HOPE MISSION | C$200 |
| YOUTH UNLIMITED EDMONTON | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$700 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- NCNORTHERN CANADA EVANGELICAL MISSION3× · 2017–2021 · C$18k · revenue +49%
- PTPOWER TO CHANGE2× · 2020–2021 · C$8k · revenue +32% · 44% of their budget
- ARADEARA RECOVERY CENTRE2× · 2023–2024 · C$400 · revenue +13%
Funded once
- TTTORCH TRAIL BIBLE CAMPone grant, 2019 · C$3k
- SMSTEEPROCK MINISTRIESone grant, 2018 · C$500 · revenue +19%
- CSCANADAIAN SOUTHERN BAPTIST SEMINARYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · C$190 · revenue +33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's purpose is to preach teach advance disseminate and demonstrate the gospel of jesus christ and the related truths of the holy bible to people everywhere.
The organization provides retreats counselling and teaching to Pastors Missionaries and Churches in Canada
Reframe ministries is the electronic media ministry of the christian reformed church in north america and around the world. the mission of reframe ministries is to use god's story of redemption to reframe lives around the world using media…
Evangelism Teaching Preaching Church Ministry Home Ministry Conferences Feeding the homeless Street ministry
Ministering through personal and family counselling
Evangelism Teaching Preaching Church Ministry Home Ministry Conferences Workshops Community Outreach Young Adult Ministries
Overnight Bible Camp providing camp experience for children and families
Missionary training -bible studies
Provide summer camps for children throughout the balance of the year. Retreats for adults children and families.
The presentation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ to boys and girls youth and adults through summer and day camps winter retreats paintball activities and the rental of facilities to charities and organizations.
We are a children & youth camp that offers summer camping programs for kids ages 6-17! We strive to create a fun & safe environment for children to learn grow & play while making new friends and lasting memories.We aim to share God's love…
Bethel Bible Camp operates summer overnight camping programs for children and adults.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Refuge Mission Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Steeprock Bay Bible Camp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.