Nipawin, SK · Charitable organization
Nipawin Apostolic Church
Worship experiences both in person and online including music teaching and prayer.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Apostolic Church of Pentecost ofCanada | C$7,636 |
| Eston College | C$1,200 |
| INTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF APOSTOLIC MINISTRIES (INOAM) | C$300 |
| NIPAWIN AND DISTRICT SERVICES TO THE HANDICAPPED INC. | C$150 |
| NIPAWIN NUTRITION FOR KIDS INC. | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$450 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- AOACOP OF CANADA - GENERAL6× · 2017–2022 · C$40k · revenue +78%
- ACApostolic Church of Pentecost of Canada2× · 2023–2024 · C$26k
- ECEston College7× · 2017–2024 · C$9k · revenue -33%
Funded once
- UYUnited Youth Outreachone grant, 2017 · C$816 · revenue +3%
- CTCCSM - TORCH TRAIL BIBLE CAMPone grant, 2022 · C$100
- NNNIPAWIN NUTRITION FOR KIDSone grant, 2019 · C$100
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Bible college - training students for ministry through classroom instruction and practical experience in churches camps and missions
Worships funerals weddings sunday school outreach baptism bible study youth/men/women groups.
1. Teaching the Word of God and preaching the Gospel of Jesus 2. Working with Individual missionaries and mission organizations engaged in the propagation of Jesus Christ 3. Direct evangelism and discipleship of national Christians
Worship experiences both in person and online including music teaching and prayer. Kids church. Kids Youth and family activities throughout the week. Family marriage and personal pastoral counseling. Kids Place before and after school care
Sunday morning worship youth programs and events adult programs and events children's programs and events conferences outreach events Christmas program Easter and Good Friday program missionary support support for families in need
We hold worship services throughout the week. we provide food to the needy; provide pastorial care; run summer camps for recreation and religious programs; help leaders and churches on first nation reserves as well as cities and villages…
Camp's mission: as an extension of our local churches we impact children and youth to become committed followers of jesus christ through biblical teaching and discipleship influence christian character through outdoor experiences and…
Christian based overnight Summer Camp for children and youth with outdoor and indoor programming.
Missions/evangelism
To bring Christianity to places that have not been reached as of yet and to train young people to do the same.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Apostolic Church of Pentecost of Canada Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Eston College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ACOP OF CANADA - GENERAL ↗
- Who funds Eston College ↗
- Who funds CSSM-Torch Trail Bible Camp ↗
- Who funds NUU Rain Inc ↗
- Who funds United Youth Outreach ↗
- Who funds Nipawin Nutrition for Kids ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF APOSTOLIC MINISTRIES (INOAM) ↗
- Who funds NIPAWIN AND DISTRICT SERVICES TO THE HANDICAPPED INC. ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.