Skip to content

Pickering, ON · Charitable organization

Niemann Pick Canada

Funding research at toronto's sick kids hospital funding research at university of michigan funding research at notre dame university

C$462k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$224k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$27k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$434k
C$210,000
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$640k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAMEC$224,131
HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDRENC$210,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANC$27,396
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 35% of grant dollars (C$1.1M). The 65% that went abroad (C$2.0M) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 65% of all-years giving (C$2.0M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
USC$1.6M · 15 grants

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.5M · 4 repeat orgsC$674k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

C$2.5M
C$450k

Still filing today

25%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$224k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$1.1M · revenue +30%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC
    4× · 2018–2022 · C$681k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$627k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DA LAC
    one grant, 2020 · C$246k
  • UO
    University of Texas in Austin
    one grant, 2018 · C$74k
  • TS
    The Scripps Research Institute
    one grant, 2017 · C$65k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field
03the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN — C$1,084,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN ↗

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under supportive health care.

Source object 702654120:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Niemann Pick Canada’s filings →