Niagara Falls, ON · Charitable organization
Niagara Worship Centre
Religious organization/congregation in niagara falls ontario.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k5 grants · C$14k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$11k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$77k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAOC - WESTERN ONTARIO DISTRICT | C$76,571 |
| PAOC - NATIONAL OFFICE | C$11,000 |
| IMPACTING ASIA MINISTRIES | C$5,100 |
| MASTERS COLLEGE AND SEMINARY | C$2,400 |
| ISRAEL PEACE MINISTRIES | C$2,400 |
| YOUTH WITH A MISSION | C$2,400 |
| INTERNATIONAL STUDENT MINISTRIES CANADA | C$1,200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PWPAOC - WESTERN ONTARIO DISTRICT8× · 2017–2024 · C$409k · revenue +58%
- PNPAOC - National Office8× · 2017–2024 · C$69k · revenue +22%
- IPISRAEL PEACE MINISTRIES8× · 2017–2024 · C$19k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- PCPROMISE CHURCHone grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue -3%
- CBChristian Blind Missiongraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +36%
- MOMission One Elevengraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue ×48
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
Teaching at conferences seminars retreats ywam schools and missions throughout the world.
Missionary training -bible studies
To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.
1. Teaching the Word of God and preaching the Gospel of Jesus 2. Working with Individual missionaries and mission organizations engaged in the propagation of Jesus Christ 3. Direct evangelism and discipleship of national Christians
Church ministry 1. worship god 2. evangelism 3. teaching and preaching the holy scripture 4. equip members and other related ministries of the gospel
Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches
Promote the word of god and to aid in spreading the gospel of jesus christ to the end of the earth. we challenge and assist people to minister to the unreached. we participate in conferences at churches bible colleges and universities for…
Mission and to communicate prophetic vision to the pentecostal holiness church of canada. to empower and assist local church leadership
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth With a Mission (Canada) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Willowdale Pentecostal Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PAOC - WESTERN ONTARIO DISTRICT ↗
- Who funds PAOC - National Office ↗
- Who funds IMPACTING ASIA MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL PEACE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Yugo-Canada Ministries ↗
- Who funds CHAPELTIME MINISTRIES OF CANADA (FREEDOM VILLAGE) ↗
- Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION ↗
- Who funds MASTERS COLLEGE AND SEMINARY ↗
- Who funds MASTERS COLLEGE AND SEMINARY (PROMISE CHURCH) ↗
- Who funds Teen Challenge ↗
- Who funds PROMISE CHURCH ↗
- Who funds Christian Blind Mission ↗
- Who funds Mission One Eleven ↗
- Who funds Willowdale Pentecostal Church ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.