St Catharines, ON · Charitable organization
Niagara Action for Animals
Spay/neuter adoption and animals in distress programs assisting low income individuals with their pets vet care
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k24 grants · C$102k
- C$10k–50k5 grants · C$60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ETOBICOKE HUMANE SOCIETY | C$15,000 |
| BURLINGTON HUMANES SOCIETY | C$15,000 |
| PACIFIC ORCA SOCIETY | C$10,000 |
| HOBBITSTEE WILDLIFE REFUGE | C$10,000 |
| ZOOCHECK CANADA | C$10,000 |
| NIAGARA FALLS COMMUNITY CATS | C$8,000 |
| PORT COLBORNE FELINE INITIATIVE | C$8,000 |
| ANIMAL ASSISTANCE SOCIETY OF NIAGARA REGION | C$8,000 |
| MY GRANDFATHERS CAT | C$7,000 |
| AMAZON RAINFOREST CONSERVANCY | C$5,000 |
| FARMHOUSE GARDEN ANIMAL HOME | C$5,000 |
| INTERIOR WILDLIFE REHABILITATION SOCIETY | C$5,000 |
| ASPEN VALLEY WILDLIFE SANCTUARY | C$5,000 |
| STORY BOOK FARM PRIMATE SANCTUARY | C$5,000 |
| PUMPKIN ACRES RABIT RESCUE | C$5,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$141k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- HWHOBBITSTEE WILDLIFE REFUGE2× · 2022–2024 · C$13k · revenue -20%
- ZCZOOCHECK CANADA2× · 2022–2024 · C$12k · revenue ×26
- FCFLAP CANADA3× · 2022–2024 · C$4k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WINDSORone grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue +4%
- TOTHE OWL FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$3k · revenue +63%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Care of animals
Animal rehabilitation
Helping animals get rescued rehabilitated and released when they are injured or orphaned.
Education on wildlife natural history rehabilitation coexistence and resolving issues Rehabilitation for injured and orphaned wild mammals
Adoption and rehabilitation of farm animals. sanctuary for farm animals. animal welfare education
Ontario Reptile Rescue is an animal rescue servicing Ontario. We rescue rehabilitate and re-home reptiles amphibians and other similar exotic pets. We also provide educational information for the public and promote the proper care and…
Alleviate animal suffering animal and wildlife rescue
Animal rescue sanctuary
Rescue rehabilitation release orphaned and injuried wildlife
Rehabilitation Of Wildlife As Per The Rules And Regulations Of The Ministry Of The Environment For Release Back Into The Wild.
Animal rescue service and sanctuary for aging abused neglected or otherwise homeless farm animals.
Rescue shelter rehabilitation adoption - 100% by volunteers
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turtle Pond Wildlife Centre and the most unlike its peers is University of Windsor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ETOBICOKE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HOBBITSTEE WILDLIFE REFUGE ↗
- Who funds ZOOCHECK CANADA ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC ORCA SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL ASSISTANCE SOCIETY OF NIAGARA REGION ↗
- Who funds PORT COLBORNE FELINE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds NIAGARA FALLS COMMUNITY CATS ↗
- Who funds MY GRANDFATHERS CAT ↗
- Who funds STORY BOOK FARM PRIMATE SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds INTERIOR WILDLIFE REHABILITATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ASPEN VALLEY WILDLIFE SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds URBAN WILDLIFE CARE ↗
- Who funds FAUNA FOUNDATION CHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds FARMHOUSE GARDEN ANIMAL HOME ↗
- Who funds TURTLE POND WILDLIFE CENTRE ↗
- Who funds PUMPKIN ACRES RABIT RESCUE ↗
- Who funds AMAZON RAINFOREST CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds FLAP CANADA ↗
- Who funds REFUGE RR POUR CHEVAUX ↗
- Who funds PROMISED LAND ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds NORTH MOUNTAIN ANIMAL SANCTUARY SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MERISCOPE ↗
- Who funds SWEET SANCTUARY ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
- Who funds ONTARIO TURTLE CONSERVATION CENTRE ↗
- Who funds THE OWL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MANITOBA BEAR REHABILITATION CENTRE INC ↗
- Who funds MARMOT RECOVERY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEARTS ON NOSES A MINI PIG SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds THE ASS MENAGERIE SANCTUARY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Eric S. Margolis Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Eric S. Margolis · National Wildlife Rehabilitation Foundation · Gordon and Patricia Gray Animal Welfare Foundation · Niagara Community Foundation Fondation Communautaire de Niagara · Nickle Family Foundation · United Way Niagara · The Calgary Foundation · United Way Golden Horseshoe · Ontario Power Generation Employees' and Pensioners' Charity Trust Fund · Toronto Foundation · United Way Maritimes/Centraide des Maritimes · Telus Employees Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.