Calgary, AB · Charitable organization
New Life Community Church
Church related services.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Evangel Christian Assembly of Calgary | C$3,385 |
| Alberta & NWT District of the Pentecostal Assemblies of Cana | C$3,247 |
| The Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada | C$1,075 |
| Vanguard College | C$812 |
| Jack Jackson Evangelical Ministries Association | C$795 |
| The Gideons International in Canada | C$300 |
| Family Foundations International - Canada | C$120 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TPTHE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA3× · 2017–2019 · C$8k · revenue +22%
- TGThe Gideons International in Canada3× · 2017–2019 · C$3k · revenue +39%
- FFFamily Foundations International - Canada3× · 2017–2019 · C$840 · revenue +8%
Funded once
- TCTEEN CHALLENGE ALBERTAgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$20 · revenue +28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Facilitating the use of alpha evangelistic courses by canadian churches alpha north america and international ministries
1. teaching and preaching 2. church planting 3. outreach 4. discipleship
The organization provides retreats counselling and teaching to Pastors Missionaries and Churches in Canada
Missionary training -bible studies
To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.
1) Production, sales and distribution of worship music (CDs, DVDs, digital) 2) Sales and distribution of religious teaching materials (CDs, DVDs, books, digital) 3) Training and equipping worship leaders and songwriters in Vineyard…
Preparing and broadcasting christian television programming in canada
Evangelism Teaching Preaching Church Ministry Home Ministry Conferences Workshops Community Outreach Young Adult Ministries
A) to provide personnel and resources for christian organizations and ministries; and b) to provide training and materials to christian leaders and individuals involved in evanglism and christian ministry worldwide
Preaching the gospel prayer meetings worship services training and overseeing other pastors and churches planting churches ordaining pastors missions work within Canada and the world.
Conferences teaching bible study & counseling
Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alberta & Nwt District of the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada and the most unlike its peers is Vanguard College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Alberta & NWT District of the Pentecostal Assemblies of Cana ↗
- Who funds THE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds Jack Jackson Evangelical Ministries Association ↗
- Who funds Vanguard College ↗
- Who funds Evangel Christian Assembly of Calgary ↗
- Who funds The Gideons International in Canada ↗
- Who funds Family Foundations International - Canada ↗
- Who funds Leket Canada ↗
- Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE ALBERTA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.