North Vancouver, BC · Charitable organization
New Life Alliance Church
On Going Programs: 1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Christian & Missionary Alliance Canada | C$8,341 |
| Christian & Missionary Alliance Pacific District | C$5,902 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 90% of grant dollars (C$94k). The 10% that went abroad (C$11k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 10% of all-years giving (C$11k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CMChristian & Missionary Alliance Pacific District6× · 2019–2024 · C$41k · revenue +13%
- CMChristian & Missionary Alliance Canada6× · 2019–2024 · C$39k · revenue +5%
- RMRBC Ministries6× · 2018–2023 · C$3k · revenue +47%
Funded once
- RMRBC Ministriesone grant, 2017 · C$500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.