New Germany, NS · Charitable organization
New Germany Pastoral Charge
Weekly worship services.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MISSION & SERVICES: UNITED CHURCH | C$2,923 |
| NEW GERMANY FOOD BANK | C$1,100 |
| SHERBROOKE LAKE CAMP | C$300 |
| CHRISTMAS DADDIES | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +99% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UCUnited Church Mission & Service Fund7× · 2017–2023 · C$18k · revenue +22%
- WNWestern NS, Camp Council of the United Church of Can.7× · 2017–2023 · C$2k · revenue +71%
- NGNew Germany & Area Food Bank2× · 2017–2018 · C$1k · revenue +302%
Funded once
- NGNEW GERMANY AND AREA FOOD BANK SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2021 · C$340 · revenue +39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.