Edmonton, AB · Charitable organization
New Destiny Church of Edmonton
This charity is a church which carried out the following activities: 1) Worship Services; 2) Bible Studies; 3) Christian Education Classes; 4) Benevolence to the poor; 5) Spiritual support for the community; 6) World Missions
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Christians for Israel | C$947 |
| Wyecliff Bible Translators of Canada | C$727 |
| Home Church (Home of Hope) | C$727 |
| The Voice of the Martyrs | C$727 |
| Shiloh Rebman Youth Ranch Society | C$727 |
| National House of Prayer | C$727 |
| World Mission Continuum | C$727 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- HCHome Church8× · 2017–2024 · C$20k · revenue +50%
- SRShiloh Rebman Youth Ranch Society8× · 2017–2024 · C$8k · revenue +43%
- CFChristians for Israel8× · 2017–2024 · C$7k · revenue +241%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.