Toronto, ON · Charitable organization
New Creation Ministries
Social outreach religious fellowship and auxiliary organizations.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANDREW WOMMACK MINISTRIES CANADA | C$7,000 |
| GRACE EXPRESSION HOUSE | C$5,000 |
| FAITH CONTENDERS MINISTRIES | C$5,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | C$4,978 |
| THE LEPROSY MISSION CANADA (EFFECT HOPE) | C$2,500 |
| COMMUNITY IMPACT | C$1,500 |
| CENTER OF LIFE CHURCH | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- AWANDREW WOMMACK MINISTRIES CANADA7× · 2018–2024 · C$25k · revenue +82%
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSE7× · 2017–2024 · C$22k · revenue +26%
- FCFAITH CONTENDERS MINISTRIES7× · 2017–2024 · C$20k · revenue +263%
Funded once
- WCWILLOWDALE COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN ASSEMBLYone grant, 2023 · C$3k · revenue 0%
- FCFAITH CONTENDERS MINISTRIESone grant, 2018 · C$2k
- LTLIGHT TO THE WORLD CHRISTIAN CHURCHone grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
Weekly worship services online weekly ministries in group settings training and discipline sunday school for adults and chldren weekly praying meetings
Broadcasting individual and group teaching
Programs are designed to preach teach and support an outreach initiative in accordance with the doctrines and principles of the Christian bible.
To worship god - sunday worship service 10am - 1pm to preach the gospel by preaching the teachings and religious tenets and doctrines of christianity. prophetic prayer - fridays 7pm to advance christian religion. word encounter -…
To gather christians for prayer and teachings through conferences. the ministry also provides individual with personal ministry.
Preaching and bible study - telephone prayer meeting and evangelism
Training qualified leaders from around world to effectively evangelize other national christians.
Personal one on one teaching Seminars/Conference Workshops Advance Training Groups Home Studies and Speaking Engagements conducted in Churches
Weekly church services bible study meetings outreach and evangelism.
Worship services - Sundays Prayer meetings - Wednesdays
Bible teaching guest speaker spiritual counselling
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Faith Contenders Ministries and the most unlike its peers is The Leprosy Mission Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ANDREW WOMMACK MINISTRIES CANADA ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds FAITH CONTENDERS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds GRACE EXPRESSION HOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE LEPROSY MISSION CANADA (EFFECT HOPE) ↗
- Who funds CENTER OF LIFE CHURCH ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY IMPACT ↗
- Who funds WILLOWDALE COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN ASSEMBLY ↗
- Who funds LIGHT TO THE WORLD CHRISTIAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds SHELTER THEM POVERTY RELIEF ↗
- Who funds FAITH BRIDGE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds INNER CITY OUTREACH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.