Skip to content

Oshawa, ON · Charitable organization

Neil Murkar Charitable Foundation

1.

C$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$7,644
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$82k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Team of CanadaC$7,644
Individual grant recipientC$6,065
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$51k · 4 repeat orgsC$76k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against -36% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
19

Total granted

C$51k
C$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
-36%

Still filing today

75%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    TEAM OF CANADA
    4× · 2018–2024 · C$26k · revenue +323%
  • LF
    LITTLE FOOTPRINTS BIG STEPS
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$13k · revenue -34%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$8k

Funded once

  • TR
    The Rotary Club of Toronto
    one grant, 2017 · C$18k
  • BC
    BIDII CHILDREN'S CHARITY
    2× · 2021–2023 · C$12k · revenue -63% · 34% of their budget
  • S
    Shelterbox
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$10k · revenue -36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pih Partners in Health Canada

Partners In Health Canada works in partnership with sister organizations in settings of poverty around the world to bring health and social justice to vulnerable and marginalized communities. We deliver high quality comprehensive health…

—
2
The Hunger Project

Ongoing programs: the hunger project canada and in partnership with the global hunger project will carry out programs of the following regions: ending hunger in rural communities in africa india bangladesh mexico and peru through the…

—
3
Penny Appeal Canada

Our domestic programs focus on Canadian Muslims refugees newcomers marginalized and racialized women BIPOC communities the homeless vulnerable students and families in need. By prioritizing community-driven solutions and leveraging…

—
4
Children International Canada

Children international canada carries out its charitable activities for the purpose of breaking generational poverty for the children they serve. this is done by delivering high-impact programs in four crucial areas: health education…

—
5
Fh Canada

Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…

—
6
Food for the Poor of Canada Inc

Food for the poor-canada is a faith-based organization dedicated to alleviating poverty in latin america and the caribbean. our humanitarian aid provides resources such as food housing and clean water. we also focus on supporting…

—
7
Volunteers for Humanity

Promote health by providing affected populations with health care services or products that prevent and manage serious threats to health and survival. Relieving poverty in developing nations by providing basic necessities of life including…

—
8
Human Concern International (Hci)

Health Programs: Deliver medical care and health education to underserved communities. Education Programs: Enhance literacy and education through school construction scholarships teachers training and educational materials. Emergency…

—
9
Hira-Human Impact Relief Association

ORPHAN EMPOWERMENT - Providing orphan relief for vulnerable children to have access to food and education. HOME FOR WIDOWS - Providing relief/shelter for vulnerable widows and orphan children by constructing homes. WATER RELIEF - Providing…

—
10
Action contre la faim Acf (Canada) / Action against hunger Acf (Canada)

Action against hunger is a global humanitarian organization that takes decisive action against the causes and effects of hunger. we save the lives of malnourished children. we ensure everyone can access clean water food training and health…

—
11
Hands for Charity

International Programs: Emergency Relief for refugees and IDPs Winter kit distributions Food distributions Cash assistance to orphans Providing shelters for displaced families and Udhiya/Qurbani. Water and Sanitation – increase access to…

—
12
Shelter Them Poverty Relief

Shelter them is an organization dedicated to helping families and vulnerable children in rwanda. the main purpose is to support children and their families via community development and furnishing housing food education and health care.…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Back Door Mission for the Relief of Poverty and the most unlike its peers is Adopt a Village in Laos. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
8/18
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTEAM OF CANADA — C$25,874 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLITTLE FOOTPRINTS BIG STEPS — C$13,335 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBIDII CHILDREN'S CHARITY — C$12,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetShelterbox — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHealth Partners International - Ukraine — C$9,229 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONTARIO SHORES FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH — C$5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBACK DOOR MISSION — C$5,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAdopt a Village in Loas — C$4,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetThe Rotary Club of Port Perry — C$3,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPush for Change Foundation — C$1,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJack.org — C$654 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSeed Program Canada — C$500 over 3y, 18% of budgetAMAROK SOCIETY — C$253 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEAM OF CANADA ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE FOOTPRINTS BIG STEPS ↗
  • Who funds BIDII CHILDREN'S CHARITY ↗
  • Who funds Shelterbox ↗
  • Who funds Health Partners International - Ukraine ↗
  • Who funds ONTARIO SHORES FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds BACK DOOR MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Adopt a Village in Loas ↗
  • Who funds The Rotary Club of Port Perry ↗
  • Who funds Push for Change Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Jack.org ↗
  • Who funds Seed Program Canada ↗
  • Who funds AMAROK SOCIETY ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Durham RegionON10× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Durham Region · Oshawa Parkwood Rotary Club Charitable Foundation · Durham Community Foundation · Herman Kassinger Foundation · Rotary Club of Bowmanville Charitable Trust · Ontario Power Generation Employees' and Pensioners' Charity Trust Fund · Pickering Rotary Club Charitable Trust · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Vancouver Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · BenefAction Foundation · My Tribute Gift Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 889597167:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Neil Murkar’s filings →