Skip to content

Calgary, AB · Charitable organization

Naval Association of Canada Calgary

We seek to educate the canadian public on their current navy and naval history.

C$22k
Granted FY2022
10
Grants FY2022
—
Regions reached
C$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,500
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$27k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VETERANS ASSOCIATION FOOD BANKC$5,125
NAVAL MUSEUM OF ALBERTA SOCIETYC$5,000
CALGARY BRANCH (RCSCC UNDAUNTED)C$1,500
CALGARY BRANCH (NLCC CAPT JACKSON)C$1,500
ROCKYVIEW BRANCH (RCSCC CHICOUTIMI)C$1,500
ROCKYVIEW BRANCH (NLCC HOLGER STORM)C$1,500
FOOTHILLS BRANCH (NLCC CDR HW EVELYN)C$1,500
BOW VALLEY BRANCH (NLCC JOHNA HAMILTONC$1,500
BOW VALLEY BRANCH (RCSCC CALGARY)C$1,500
Individual grant recipientC$1,500
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 0% of grant dollars (C$0). The 100% that went abroad (C$97k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 100% of all-years giving (C$97k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$29k · 10 repeat orgsC$67k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
31

Total granted

C$29k
C$46k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$21k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2018–2021 · C$4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2018–2020 · C$3k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · C$3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · C$3k
  • NM
    NAVAL MUSEUM OF ALBERTA
    one grant, 2018 · C$3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2022.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2018–2022, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under educational orgs n.e.c..

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 119246569:2022-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Naval Association of Canada Calgary’s filings →