Nashwaak Village, NB · Charitable organization
Nashwaak United Baptist Church
Worship services missionary services
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FREDERICTON HOMELESS SHELTER | C$100 |
| GREENER VILLAGE UNIQUE BOUTIQUE | C$100 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$100 |
| YORK ASSOCIATION | C$100 |
| CANADIAN BAPTISTS OF ATLANTIC CANADA | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MMMedia Matters6× · 2018–2023 · C$17k · revenue +572% · 38% of their budget
- FHFREDERICTON HOMELESS SHELTER3× · 2021–2023 · C$1k · revenue +57%
- WIWOMEN IN TRANSITION HOUSE INC2× · 2021–2022 · C$600 · revenue +14%
Funded once
- MMMedia Mattersone grant, 2017 · C$9k
- WIWOMEN IN TRANSITION HOUSE INCone grant, 2023 · C$300
- HFHOSPICE FREDERICTONone grant, 2023 · C$250
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.