Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Naramata, BC · Charitable organization

Naramata Community Fund Society

We provide relief and assistance to members of the community facing hardship as a result of poverty natural disaster or sudden catastrophe.

C$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$2k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$2,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENTICTON SECONDAY SCHOOL BURSARY FUNDC$2,000
NARAMATA COMMUNITY CHURCHC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$14k · 3 repeat orgsC$6k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -27% since the first grant, against -50% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

C$14k
C$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-27%
-50%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • P
    PENTICTON
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$12k · revenue +185%
  • NC
    NARAMATA COMMUNITY CHURCH
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$1k · revenue -27%
  • NC
    NARAMATA COMMUNITY CHURCH
    2× · 2021–2024 · C$750 · revenue -50%

Funded once

  • SD
    SCHOOL DISTRICT 67 (NARAMATA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL)
    one grant, 2020 · C$3k · revenue -50%
  • PS
    PENTICTON SECONDARY SCHOOL BURSARY FUND
    one grant, 2020 · C$2k
  • RD
    REGIONAL DISTRICT OF OKANAGAN SIMILKAMEEN
    one grant, 2020 · C$1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
1/4
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPENTICTON — C$12,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetSCHOOL DISTRICT 67 (NARAMATA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL) — C$3,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNARAMATA COMMUNITY CHURCH — C$1,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetNARAMATA COMMUNITY CHURCH — C$750 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under supportive health care.

Source object 879668317:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Naramata Community Fund Society’s filings →