Goulais River, ON · Charitable organization
Mountain View Baptist Church (Of Goulais River)
We support missionaries who are retired and one who travels through africa through baptist mid missions planting partners through continental baptist missions
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | C$1,500 |
| BAPTIST INTERNATION MISSIONS INC | C$1,050 |
| BAPTIST MID MISSIONS OF CANADA | C$420 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- BBIMI2× · 2020–2022 · C$2k · revenue +19%
- BMBAPTIST MID MISSIONS OF CANADA3× · 2020–2022 · C$2k · revenue +30%
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2021–2022 · C$2k
Funded once
- HLHARBOR LIGHT BAPTIST CHURCHgraduatedone grant, 2021 · C$2k · revenue +102%
- BMBAPTIST MID-MISSIONone grant, 2018 · C$1k
- HLHARBOUR LIGHT CHURCHone grant, 2020 · C$794
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.