Maple Creek, SK · Charitable organization
Mount Calvary Lutheran Church
1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Lutheran Church Canada | C$1,000 |
| Canadian World Relief | C$500 |
| Concordia Lutheran Seminary | C$500 |
| Lutheran Ministry in Hospitals of Saskatoon | C$400 |
| Lutheran Laymens League of Canada | C$300 |
| Lutheran Association of Mission and Pilots Incorporated | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$200 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LCLutheran Church Canada-Central District8× · 2017–2024 · C$14k · revenue -100% · 50% of their budget
- CLCONCORDIA LUTHERAN SEMINARY6× · 2018–2024 · C$3k · revenue +54%
- CWCANADIAN WORLD RELIEF6× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- CLCONCORDIA LUTHERAN MISSION SOCIETYone grant, 2022 · C$2k
- L(LAMP (Lutheran Assoc. of Missionaries & Pilots)one grant, 2017 · C$755
- LLLutheran Laymans League of Canadaone grant, 2017 · C$700
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Lutheran Church Canada-Central District ↗
- Who funds CONCORDIA LUTHERAN SEMINARY ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN WORLD RELIEF ↗
- Who funds Lutheran Laymans League of Canada ↗
- Who funds EDEN CARE COMMINITIES FOUNDATION INC. ↗
- Who funds Lutheran Ministry in Hospital of Saskatoon ↗
- Who funds Regina Lutheran Hospital Chaplaincy ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Beginnings Lutheran Church Inc. · Lutheran Church - Canada Financial Ministries · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.