Amherstburg, ON · Charitable organization
Mount Beulah Church Amherstburg
Preaching & teaching the gospel of jesus christ according to god's word the holy bible.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMHERSTBURG FOOD & FELLOWSHIP MISSION | C$7,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JESUS | C$7,000 |
| JEWISH VOICE MINISTRIES CANADA | C$7,000 |
| AMHERSTBURG FREEDOM MUSEUM | C$3,000 |
| CENTRAL GROVE A.M.E. CHURCH | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against -87% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- JVJEWISH VOICE MINISTRIES CANADA8× · 2017–2024 · C$40k · revenue +41%
- IFINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JESUS8× · 2017–2024 · C$40k · revenue +37%
- AFAMHERSTBURG FOOD & FELLOWSHIP MISSION6× · 2019–2024 · C$32k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- AFAmherstburg Food & Fellowship Missionone grant, 2018 · C$3k
- TCT.C.T. Canadaone grant, 2017 · C$3k
- AFAmherstburg Food & Fellowshipone grant, 2017 · C$3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Preaching & teaching the gospel of jesus christ according to god's word the holy bible. also weekly bible study sunday school & worship services home & hospital visitations & assisting the needy as much as possible. also supporting…
Preaching the gospel through broadcasting TV programs Printed publications Emergency Relief Media evangelism Campaigns
Propagation of the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ overseas outreach mass evangelism teaching and training seminars newsletters website street witnessing outreach to refugee camps in Germany and Europe
Publishing missionary organizations evangelism social outreach religious fellowship
The ministry mission is spreading the propagation of the gospel
Church services visitation tract ministry book distribution internet ministry open air preaching feeding the hungry overseas missions evangelism assisting overseas pastors podcasts and internet radio
Place of worship missionary organization religious publishing
Missionary fellowship
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amherstburg Food and Fellowship Mission and the most unlike its peers is Gilgal Christian Community. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH VOICE MINISTRIES CANADA ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JESUS ↗
- Who funds AMHERSTBURG FOOD & FELLOWSHIP MISSION ↗
- Who funds AMHERSTBURG FREEDOM MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds BILL WINSTON MINISTRIES CANADA ↗
- Who funds SALVATION ARMY ↗
- Who funds AMHERSTBURG COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL MUKTI MISSION ↗
- Who funds British Methodist Episcopal Church ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL GROVE A.M.E. CHURCH ↗
- Who funds Amherstburg Goodfellows ↗
- Who funds One Church Windsor ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.