Morinville, AB · Charitable organization
Morinville Alliance Church
Weekly worship services sunday school program ministries for men women youth and children.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WESTERN CANADA DISTRICT OF C&MA | C$5,994 |
| THE CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLIANCE IN CANADA | C$1,610 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- WCWESTERN CANADA DISTRICT OF C&MA8× · 2017–2024 · C$44k · revenue +25%
- TCThe Christian and Missionary Alliance in Canada8× · 2017–2024 · C$25k · revenue +12%
- WRWorld Relief Canada2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- WVWORLD VISION CANADAone grant, 2019 · C$443 · revenue +13%
- CTCOMMISSION TO EVERY NATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$200 · revenue +33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.