Skip to content
Canadian charities

Mitchell, MB · Charitable organization

Mitchell Community Fellowship Inc.

Church related activities + programs including church sunday school outreach

C$3k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
2
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$251k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEINBACH COMMUNITY OUTREACHC$1,000
SOUTH EAST HELPING HANDSC$1,000
MCCC$950
SAUTI MOJAC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$38k · 10 repeat orgsC$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +135% since the first grant, against +47% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

C$38k
C$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+135%
+47%

Still filing today

90%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    STEINBACH COMMUNITY OUTREACH
    4× · 2019–2023 · C$8k · revenue +135%
  • SO
    SOUPS ON STEINBACH
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$6k · revenue +189%
  • AH
    AGAPE HOUSE
    3× · 2018–2022 · C$5k · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • M
    MCCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$2k · revenue +47%
  • NE
    North End Family Centre
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue -76%
  • CF
    Canadian Foodgrains Bankgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$1k · revenue +71%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mennonite Central Committee (Saskatchewan)

Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) is a global non-profit organization that strives to share God's love and compassion through relief development and peacebuilding. MCC Saskatchewan supports the international relief development and peace…

—
2
Mennonite Central Committee (Mcc) British Columbia

Forwards funds to Mennonite Central Committee Canada to support international relief. Warehouse collects and ships clothing/blankets/food/medical supplies to Mennonite Central Committee Canada for forwarding to other countries. Partners…

—
3
Mennonite Central Committee Alberta

Mennonite central committee (mcc) is a global non-profit organization engaged in relief development & peace-building. mcc ab supports this work through fundraising efforts. mcc ab also engages in provincial prgorams including resettlement…

—
4
Mennonite Central Committee Ontario

MCC is a worldwide non-profit organization that shares God’s love and compassion for all by responding to basic human needs and working for peace and justice. MCC Ontario supports the international programs of MCC through our financial and…

—
5
War Child Canada

The charity War Child Canada helps families and communities in Afghanistan the Democratic Republic of Congo South Sudan Sudan Uganda and Yemen through education youth and women’s livelihoods support and other vital services. The charity…

—
6
Fh Canada

Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…

—
7
Manitoba Council for International Co-Operation Inc.

Programing for students and educators and the general public. Capacity building for our member organizations and others. Education and awareness of the Sustainable Development Goals. International Development Week activities.…

—
8
Meda Impact Investments

MEDA Impact Investments combines innovative financial and technical expertise to build and enhance sustainable agri-food systems that provide decent work for people living in poverty with a focus on systematically marginalized communities…

—
9
Muslim Hands

Delivery of projects outside of Canada is through an affiliated Muslim Hands Organization. Together with local partners and country offices Muslim Hands is working in the world's poorest countries to tackle the root causes of poverty and…

—
10
Tearfund Canada

Tearfund is passionate to see all people freed from poverty living transformed lives and reaching their god-given potential. firmly affirming national leadership we collaborate with church-based partners across the global south to fix the…

—
11
Minden Community Food Centre

Local food bank for those in need. Distribution Hub for other food banks in the area. Financial Support for food for kids. Prepare Frozen Meals for clients in our community kitchen. Distribute used clothing and household supplies and…

—
12
Bullyingcanada Inc.

BullyingCanada is Canada’s only wrap-around mental health service for bullied youth. We work one-on-one with them their parents and local supports for as long as it takes to bring an end to the bullying and help them heal a process that…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mennonite Central Committee Manitoba Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Sauti Moja. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
14/15
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTEINBACH COMMUNITY OUTREACH — C$8,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUPS ON STEINBACH — C$5,750 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetAGAPE HOUSE — C$5,250 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITEE — C$4,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMB SCHIZOPHRENIA SOCIETY — C$3,225 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMDS — C$2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINNER CITY YOUTH ALIVE — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAUTI MOJA — C$1,725 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMCC — C$1,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInner City Youth Alive — C$1,650 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNorth End Family Centre — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCanadian Foodgrains Bank — C$1,025 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSurvivors Hope Crisis Centre — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSOUTH EAST HELPING HANDS — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTEACH BEYOND — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winnipeg Foundati…St. Paul's Evangelica…Steinbach McC Communi…Hylife Foundation Inc.Abundance CanadaAll Charities CampaignCHIMP: Charitable Imp…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
The Winnipeg FoundationMB9.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winnipeg Foundation · St. Paul's Evangelical Lutheran Church of Steinbach Inc · Steinbach McC Community Assistance Centre Inc. · Hylife Foundation Inc. · Abundance Canada · All Charities Campaign · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 842740763:2023-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Mitchell Community Fellowship’s filings →