Montreal, QC · Charitable organization
Missions Sainte-Croix
Aider les oeuvres missionnaires de la congrégation de siante-croix et agir comme procure des missions.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$5k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE SAINT-LAURENT | C$75,000 |
| ORATOIRE SAINT JOSEPH | C$10,000 |
| AIDE INTERNATIONAL POUR L'ENFANCE | C$2,000 |
| MISSIONS CHEZ NOUS | C$1,600 |
| MISSIONS ESQUE'OMI | C$1,500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$75k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- OSORATOIRE SAINT- JOSEPH2× · 2020–2023 · C$20k · revenue +116%
- AIAIDE INTERNATIONAL POUR L'ENFANCE5× · 2018–2023 · C$6k · revenue +65%
- SJSolidarité jeunesse (5 fois 100$)2× · 2017–2018 · C$800 · revenue +54%
Funded once
- LPLE PÈLERINgraduated2× · 2018–2020 · C$50k · revenue +31%
- OVOEUVRES VOSH SANTA CRUZgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$25k · revenue +101%
- MSMISSIONS SSQU'OMIone grant, 2019 · C$500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Exercice de la religion catholique romaine
Exercice de la Religion Catholique
Exercice de la religion catholique romaine
Exercice de la religion catholique rassemblement liturgique initiation sacrementel coéducation à la foi pastorale des malades etc.
Administrer des biens de la fabrique sur un territoire érigé en paroisse pour des fins de religion catholique romaine au profit des fidèles de cette religion. assurer l'évangélisation le culte et les sacrements promouvoir la pratique de la…
Exercice de la religion catholique romaine
Exercice de la religion catholique
Exercice de la religion catholique romaine
Exercice de la religion catholique
1) occupation des lieux saints
Exercice de la religion catholique romaine.
Exercices de la religion catholique romaine
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Chez-Nous and the most unlike its peers is RÉSeau Entraide SolidaritÉ Monde. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE SAINT-LAURENT ↗
- Who funds LE PÈLERIN ↗
- Who funds OEUVRES VOSH SANTA CRUZ ↗
- Who funds ORATOIRE SAINT- JOSEPH ↗
- Who funds AIDE INTERNATIONAL POUR L'ENFANCE ↗
- Who funds MISSIONS CHEZ NOUS ↗
- Who funds MISSIONS ESQUE'OMI ↗
- Who funds ENTRAIDE MISSIONNAIRE INC. ↗
- Who funds RÉSEAU ENTRAIDE SOLIDARITÉ MONDE ↗
- Who funds Solidarité jeunesse (5 fois 100$) ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oeuvres Regis-Vernet · Compagnie de Jésus · La Societe de Marie Reparatrice · La Congrégation des Soeurs de Sainte-Anne · Les Oeuvres des Religieuses Adoratrices du Précieux Sang · Les Soeurs de la Congrégation de Notre Dame · Les Petites Soeurs de la Sainte-Famille · Sjsh - District Du Canada · Les Soeurs Des Saints Noms de Jesus Et de Marie Du Quebec · Oeuvres Caritatives Des Filles de Jesus Canada · Les Augustines de la Miséricorde de Jésus du Monastère Saint-Augustin · Union Canadienne Des Moniales de L'Ordre de Saint Ursule
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.