Mont-Royal, QC · Public foundation
Miriam Foundation / Fondation Miriam
The miriam foundation obtains funds through various donations and other fundraising activities (golf tournaments events ect.) funds raised are used to fund various organizations including the abe gold learning and research center and the lou greenberg-miriam association which provides housing and educational programs for the…
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k2 grants · C$9k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$15k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EMMANUEL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | C$15,000 |
| MIRIAM HOME / CIUSSS | C$8,113 |
| LOU GREENBERG - MIRIAM ASSOCIAITON | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- ECEMMANUEL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL5× · 2018–2024 · C$88k · revenue +13%
- LGLOU GREENBERG - MIRIAM ASSOCIATION4× · 2021–2024 · C$27k · revenue +113%
- OEOPERATION ENFANT SOLEIL2× · 2017–2018 · C$4k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- JCJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$533k · revenue +184%
- MHMIRIAM HOME / CIUSSSone grant, 2020 · C$224k
- LDL'UNIVERSITE DU QUEBEC A MONTREALone grant, 2021 · C$24k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Activités d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche
Enseignement et recherche universitaire
Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…
La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal
Institution universitaire dont la mission est l'enseignement et la recherche
Provide the highest quality continuum of health care and social services throughout out network of institution provide compassionate care and services that are centered on the user and create an exceptional user experience develop and…
La fondaiton a pour but de promouvoir une meilleure connaissance et compréhension de la science des technologies et de leur histoire.
Provide the highest quality continuum of health care and social services throughout our network of institution. provide compassionate care and services that are centered on the user and create an exceptional user experence. develop and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is UniversitÉ Du QuÉBec À MontrÉAl and the most unlike its peers is Center for Innovation in Autism and Intellectual Disabilities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTRE FOR INNOVATION IN AUTISM AND INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONTREAL MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ↗
- Who funds EMMANUEL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds LOU GREENBERG - MIRIAM ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds L'UNIVERSITE DU QUEBEC A MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds MCGILL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds TEMPLE EMANU-EL BETH SHOLOM ↗
- Who funds OPERATION ENFANT SOLEIL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.