Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Moose Jaw, SK · Charitable organization

Minto United Church

We gather our faith community in-person every sunday morning at 10:30 a.m.

C$410
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$410
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$410
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$257k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP SHAGABECC$410
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$40k · 4 repeat orgsC$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

C$40k
C$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+11%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$410 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    The United Church of Canada
    5× · 2017–2023 · C$38k · revenue +22%
  • HI
    HUNGER IN MOOSE JAW
    2× · 2018–2022 · C$949 · revenue +25%
  • IC
    International Childrens Awareness
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$737 · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • MJ
    MOOSE JAW & DISTRICT FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$825 · revenue +283%
  • SB
    SASKATCHEWAN BRIAN INJURY ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2018 · C$585 · revenue -11%
  • CR
    CANADIAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2018 · C$549 · revenue -7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ymca of Moose Jaw Inc.

We are a charity dedicated to strengthening the foundations of communities. We do this by nurturing the potential of children teens and young adults; promoting healthy living; and fostering social responsibility. Our focus on inclusiveness…

—
2
Shelterbox Canada

ShelterBox Canada provides shelter essential items and technical assistance to help some of the world’s most vulnerable people recover and rebuild their homes after disaster. ShelterBox teams listen and adapt our support to the needs of…

—
3
Second Harvest Canada Deuxième Récolte Canada

Second harvest is canada's largest food rescue organization and a global thought leader on perishable food recovery. operating at the intersection of hunger relief and environmental protection second harvest rescues perishable…

—
4
Food Banks Canada/Banques Alimentaires Canada

Food banks canada's mission is to provide national leadership to relieve hunger today and prevent hunger tomorrow in collaboration with the food bank network in canada. food banks canada is a national charitable organization dedicated to…

—
5
Cooperation Canada - Coopération Canada

Cooperation Canada is Canada's national association of international development and humanitarian organizations. Cooperation Canada brings together and advocates for effective Canadian international development assistance by convening…

—
6
Fh Canada

Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…

—
7
Action contre la faim Acf (Canada) / Action against hunger Acf (Canada)

Action against hunger is a global humanitarian organization that takes decisive action against the causes and effects of hunger. we save the lives of malnourished children. we ensure everyone can access clean water food training and health…

—
8
International Development Research Centre

Created by Parliament in 1970 IDRC has been committed in supporting research in developing countries undertaken by the people of those countries for their own development. IDRC has five areas of focus: Climate-Resilient Food Systems Global…

—
9
Islamic Relief - Ir Canada

Islamic Relief Canada carries out humanitarian and development programs in over 30 countries. Programs include: • Livelihoods focused on climate-adaptive support and/or economic empowerment; • Health including water sanitation and hygiene…

—
10
Canadian Food for Children

The organization's purpose is to create awareness and collect food and medical supplies for distribution to those in need in africa south america and other regions of the world with extreme poverty.

—
11
Food Banks of Saskatchewan Corporation

Acquire food and consumer products by donation or otherwise for distribution to agencies serving the hungry and for distribution to member food banks. receive and distribute to member food banks donations and gifts of any kind made for the…

—
12
Square One Community Inc.

Identify and measure housing and basic needs gaps in the community develop a housing secure strategy for moose jaw with a plan to end homelessness. develop a financial plan to support short term goals and long term sustainability develop a…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Moose Jaw Womens Transition Association Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Canadahelps Canadon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe United Church of Canada — C$38,056 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER IN MOOSE JAW — C$949 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMOOSE JAW & DISTRICT FOOD BANK — C$825 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetInternational Childrens Awareness — C$737 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRIVERSIDE MISSION / SOULS HARBOUR — C$624 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSASKATCHEWAN BRIAN INJURY ASSOCIATION — C$585 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCANADIAN RED CROSS — C$549 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOOSE JAW TRANSITION HOUSE — C$457 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP SHAGABEC — C$410 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCANADA HELPS — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of ReginaUnited Way East Ontar…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
United Way of ReginaSK7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Regina · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 119041937:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Minto United Church’s filings →