Skip to content

Minnedosa, MB · Public foundation

Minnedosa Health District Auxiliary

Purchased equipment for local health facility.

C$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
Regions reached
C$500
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$50
Median grant
4
Regions reached
C$40k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STARS - WINNIPEG DIVISIONC$500
CENTRAL PLAINS CANCER CARE SOCITYC$500
ARTHRITIS SOCIETYC$50
ALZHEMIER SOCIETYC$50
MS SOCIETYC$50
OSTEOPOROSISC$50
HEART & STROKE FOUNDATIONC$50
KIDNEY FOUNDATIONC$50
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$6k · 11 repeat orgsC$1k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

C$6k
C$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+6%

Still filing today

91%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CENTRAL PLAINS CANCER CARE SOCIETY
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$2k · revenue +48%
  • S
    STARS
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$1k · revenue +29%
  • KF
    KIDNEY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$400 · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • PM
    PRAIRIE MOUNTAIN HEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · C$1k · revenue +6%
  • AS
    ARTHRITIS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · C$50

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hypertension Canada

Advancing the health of Canadians by enabling the detection prevention and control of high blood pressure and its complications. Hypertension Canada delivers against its mission/vision by striving for excellence in three core service…

—
2
Pancreatic Cancer Canada Cancer du Pancreas Canada

Research: provided continued funding for an early detection study called prosperpanc that aims to identify biomarkers for faster diagnosis of pancreatic cancer as well as a study assessing the current landscape of palliative care in…

—
3
Cancer Care Ontario

Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) is the provincial government agency responsible for driving health system performance improvement for Ontario's cancer and chronic kidney disease health systems. CCO also supports achievement of Ontario's Wait…

—
4
Canadian Myeloma Research Group

In Canada researchers figure prominently in the development of innovative and very promising clinical trials. The Canadian Myeloma Research Group (CMRG) is the first and only national organization bringing together Canada's leading cancer…

—
5
Ovarian Cancer Canada/Cancer De L'ovaire Canada

Research: Investing in pan-Canadian and patient-centered research across the full continuum of ovarian cancer from prevention to diagnosis to treatment to survivorship. Our research investments are enabling discoveries by establishing and…

—
6
The Arthritis Research Centre Society of Canada/Arthrite-Recherche Canada

The arthritis research centre society of canada conducts practical research into the prevention self treatment and self management of arthritis for canadians. with more than 50 research projects iinto the many forms of arthritis underway…

—
7
Canadian Lung Association - Association Pulmonaire Du Canada

Provide fellowships studentships and other awards for research on issues related to respiratory health as conducted through universities and other research facilities throughout Canada. Offer support to individuals with lung health issues…

—
8
Heart and Stroke Foundation Canadian Partnership Fof Stroke Recovery

1. support the development of tools and resources for clinicians patients and families 2. hub for training and networking in stroke recovery 3. multi-site trials in stroke recovery

—
9
Canadian Cancer Survivor Network

CCSN raises awareness among decision-makers through research on patient needs and responding to consultation opportunities of drug approval agencies. CCSN promotes health and patient input into health policy by continuing to advise…

—
10
Lung Saskatchewan Inc.

1. Our general role is to improve respiratory health through programs education research training treatment and prevention of lung disease and promotion of a healthy environment and healthy lifestyles. 2.We promote tobacco use reduction…

—
11
Prostate Cancer Canada

Prostate Cancer Canada has continued to responsibly invest the generous donations of Canadians to develop the most promising studies and minds Canada has to offer in the field of prostate cancer research. We have continued to ensure the…

—
12
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario

1. funds researchers working in universities hospitals and research institutes across ontario. 2. provides the public with health information and education programs on preventing and managing heart disease and stroke. 3. provides…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Societe De L'arthrite Du Canada and the most unlike its peers is Southern Health-SantÉ Sud. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRAL PLAINS CANCER CARE SOCIETY — C$1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPRAIRIE MOUNTAIN HEALTH — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARS — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDNEY FOUNDATION — C$400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHEART & STROKE FOUNDATION — C$400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER SOCIETY — C$400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDIABETES CANADA — C$400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS SOCIETY — C$300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMS SOCIETY OF CANADA — C$300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOSTEOPORSIS CANADA — C$250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP BRIDGES — C$200 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRAL PLAINS CANCER CARE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE MOUNTAIN HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds STARS ↗
  • Who funds KIDNEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEART & STROKE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds DIABETES CANADA ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MS SOCIETY OF CANADA ↗
  • Who funds OSTEOPORSIS CANADA ↗
  • Who funds CAMP BRIDGES ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

All Charities CampaignMB7.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: All Charities Campaign · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 119041770:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Minnedosa Health District Auxiliary’s filings →