Sainte-Cecile-De-Milton, QC · Charitable organization
Ministère croix et vie
établir mantenir et diriger un ou plusieurs lieux de culte pour annoncer l'évangile de jésus christ
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DISTRICT DU QUÉBEC ASSEMBLÉES DE LA PENTECÔTE DU CANADA | C$1,620 |
| MINISTÈRES ENSEIGNE MOI | C$1,350 |
| GÉNÉRATION UNITÉ | C$333 |
| ÉGLISE DE LA VICTOIRE DU QUÉBEC | C$303 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- DDDISTRICT DU QUÉBEC ASSEMBLÉES DE LA PENTECÔTE DU CANADA4× · 2018–2023 · C$4k · revenue +37%
- MRMINISTÈRE RELATION D'AIDE COEUR À COEUR3× · 2018–2022 · C$2k · revenue +83%
- LIL'ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALE DES GÉDÉONS AU CANADA2× · 2017–2018 · C$700 · revenue +39%
Funded once
- ADASSEMBLÉE DU PLEIN ÉVANGILEone grant, 2022 · C$3k · revenue +12%
- HCHOME CHURCHone grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue +19%
- DCDestiny Church Ministriesone grant, 2017 · C$333
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Enseignement biblique évangélisation
Enseigner la parole de dieu au travers de la bible / évangélisation
Prédication évangélisation avancement de la réligion
Enseignement de l'évangile par la prédication lors du service le dimanche et sur semaine. proclamation de l'évangile. cours biblique. relation d'aide.
Culte évangélique biblique
Évangélisation de la communauté
Enseignement des préceptes bibliques et prédicaiton de l'évangile de jésus-christ.
Tenir et administrer une église évangélique
Promouvoir la parole de dieu
Culte du dimanche matin étude biblique et prière les mercredis évangélisation travail pastoral des membres et des visiteurs
Prédication et enseignement de la bible assemblées le dimanche et sur semaine visites dans les hôpitaux et foyer aide aux démunis de la société fraternisation auprès de la congrégation
Precher la parole de dieu enseignement biblique aux adultes et enfants
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ministères EnseigneMoi / TeachMe Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Le 1236. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DISTRICT DU QUÉBEC ASSEMBLÉES DE LA PENTECÔTE DU CANADA ↗
- Who funds ASSEMBLÉE CHRÉTIENNE DE LA GRÂCE ↗
- Who funds ASSEMBLÉE DU PLEIN ÉVANGILE ↗
- Who funds HOME CHURCH ↗
- Who funds MINISTÈRE RELATION D'AIDE COEUR À COEUR ↗
- Who funds MINISTÈRES ENSEIGNE MOI ↗
- Who funds L'ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALE DES GÉDÉONS AU CANADA ↗
- Who funds INSTITUT BIBLIQUE DU QUEBEC ↗
- Who funds GÉNÉRATION UNITÉ ↗
- Who funds ÉGLISE DE LA VICTOIRE DU QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds ÉGLISE SALUT ET DÉLIVRANCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Le 1236 · Église Gospelvie · Église Vie Abondante · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.