Rocklin, NS · Charitable organization
Middle River Presbyterian Church
Hold weekly worship services give pastoral care to those in need donate funds to presbyterian sharing to support national and international programs and missionaries provide ministries for men women youth and children on a weekly basis donate funds to presbyterian world service and development for relief and development work to…
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN CANADA | C$1,500 |
| THE PICTOU COUNTY FUEL FUND SOCIETY | C$500 |
| OUR DAILY BREAD MINISTRIES | C$50 |
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH HOPEWELL | C$50 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$550 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PCPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN CANADA8× · 2017–2024 · C$12k · revenue -28%
- PCPICTOU CO. FOOD BANK2× · 2017–2020 · C$225 · revenue +276%
- ODOUR DAILY BREAD MINISTRIES3× · 2021–2024 · C$100 · revenue +4%
Funded once
- CRCANADIAN RED CROSSone grant, 2023 · C$500 · revenue -48%
- TMTHE MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF THE ATLANTIC PROVINCESgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$135 · revenue ×69
- BHBIRCH HILL CEMETERY CORP.graduatedone grant, 2020 · C$100 · revenue +363%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Funds are raised and distributed to needy families at christmas by way of food vouchers and other charitable means.
The society provides food for families in need in the area. food bank program.
The food bank continues to be staffed by volunteers only. The volunteers collect donations from local businesses and then distributes food to people in need on Saturday mornings.
The pender island food bank society provides supplemental food to needy individuals and families on pender island bc and at christmas provides gifts and food hampers for children and seniors in need.
To provide burial plots and perpetual care to deceased persons
School food program and supporting other local charities
The distribution of donated and purchased food items to the disadvantaged and needy in the hagersville area and the mississaugas of the credit first nation reserve
Food bank serving west prince county
Presbyterians Sharing Presbyterian World Service & Development World Vision Camp Kintail Crop Share Rural Response for Healthy Children (Huron County Christmas Bureau)
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustee Board of the Presbyterian Church in Canada and the most unlike its peers is First Presbyterian Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN CANADA ↗
- Who funds THE PICTOU COUNTY FUEL FUND SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN RED CROSS ↗
- Who funds PICTOU CO. FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF THE ATLANTIC PROVINCES ↗
- Who funds BIRCH HILL CEMETERY CORP. ↗
- Who funds OUR DAILY BREAD MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds The Shepherd's Lunch Room ↗
- Who funds FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH HOPEWELL ↗
- Who funds CAMP GEDDIE-CAMP OF THE SYNOD OF THE ATLANTIC PROVINCES OF T ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.