Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

Mesivta Lubavitch Toronto

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

C$111k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k6 grants · C$22k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$89k
C$5,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bais Chaya MushkaC$35,323
Jewish Russian Community CentreC$29,625
Chabad Jewish Centre of WoodbridgeC$24,330
Kollel Daf Yomi InstitureC$5,150
Yeshivas Lubavitch TorontoC$5,000
Beth Jacob Vianshei Drildz CongregationC$5,000
Bobover Yeshiva Bnei ZionC$3,663
Jewish Heritage Foundation of CanadaC$1,800
Yeshivas Yesodei HatorahC$1,035
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.4M · 21 repeat orgsC$752k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
21

Total granted

C$1.4M
C$723k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+20%

Still filing today

95%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    CHARITY EX
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$269k · revenue +58%
  • AT
    ACHAI TEMIMIM
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$218k · revenue +59% · 53% of their budget
  • BC
    Bais Chaya Mushka
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$134k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED JUDAIC STUDIES
    one grant, 2022 · C$327k · revenue -33%
  • JN
    JEWISH NIAGARAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$210k · revenue +51%
  • F
    FJC-FSUgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$100k · revenue +79%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
2
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
3
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
4
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
5
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
6
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
7
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
8
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—
9
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
10
Yeshivas Nachalas Zvi

Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.

—
11
Abraham Kahn

The charity maintained an educational program to assist students in enhancing their knowledge and expertise in various areas pertaining to judaic studies.

—
12
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shomrai Shaboth-Chevrah Mishnayoth Congregation and the most unlike its peers is Canadahelps Canadon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/41
Grantees still filing
27/41
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH RUSSIAN COMMUNITY CENTRE — C$420,795 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED JUDAIC STUDIES — C$327,457 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetCHARITY EX — C$269,426 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetACHAI TEMIMIM — C$218,311 over 2y, 53% of budgetJEWISH NIAGARA — C$210,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetBais Chaya Mushka — C$133,929 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetOHOLEI MENACHEM — C$105,487 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetFJC-FSU — C$99,985 over 1y, 12% of budgetSAMUEL ZAHAVY CHEDER CHABAD SCHOOL — C$79,568 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCHABAD OF MIDTOWN — C$65,775 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCONGREGATION KAHAL AVREICHIM — C$44,828 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetChabad Jewish Centre of Woodbridge — C$24,330 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetKAV SHALOM KHM — C$23,915 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetBOBOVER YESHIVA BNEI ZION — C$21,773 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBETH OLOTH — C$14,597 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETH JACOB VIANSHEI DRILDZ CONGREGATION — C$12,400 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTORONTO CHESED FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCAMP GAN ISRAEL — C$6,452 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF BETH AVRAHAM — C$6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBETH JACOB — C$5,815 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBETH JOSEPH ANSHAI NEW YORK — C$5,600 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBNEI ZION — C$5,180 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetKollel Daf Yomi Institure — C$5,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD LUBAVITCH — C$4,590 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLA — C$4,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR LIFELONG LEARNING — C$4,140 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetCHABAD JEWISH CENTRE OF DURHAM REGION — C$3,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetACHIM TORONTO — C$2,915 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS CHOMESH — C$2,900 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJewish Heritage Foundation of Canada — C$2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARDES CHANA — C$2,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYeshivas Yesodei Hatorah — C$1,965 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOHR TEMIMIM — C$1,939 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYACHAD — C$1,485 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE — C$1,380 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEICHAL KOL YAAKOV — C$1,300 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP GAN ISRAEL ONTARIO — C$900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHAAREI SHAMAIM — C$610 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMY CHARITY FUND — C$602 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOMRAI SHABBOS — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zichron Binyomin Charity FoundationON21.6× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · Chabad of Midtown · My Charity Fund · Chabad Lubavitch of Richmond Hill · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Moral Arc Foundation · Mashiyev Family Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Jewish Niagara · Toronto Chesed Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · Fieldgate Cares Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-08-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Source object 806176319:2024-08-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Mesivta Lubavitch Toronto’s filings →