Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Meota, SK · Charitable organization

Meota United Anglican Church

Regular weekly church services including Weddings Baptisms Grief Counseling Operating Youth programs and Food Bank.

C$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$10k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
C$2,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$768k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Living Sky School Division 202C$10,000
Empty Stocking FundC$5,000
BUH FoundationC$2,500
Northwest School Division 203C$2,500
Lakeland Library RegionC$250
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$42k · 4 repeat orgsC$43k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

C$42k
C$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+10%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LIVING SKY SCHOOL DIVISION
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$25k · revenue -1%
  • SA
    St. Andrew's College
    3× · 2019–2021 · C$8k
  • TR
    TURTLE RIVER PARISH FOOD BANK
    2× · 2018–2023 · C$5k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • LS
    Living Sky Scholl Division
    one grant, 2021 · C$10k
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES SASKgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$6k · revenue +59%
  • SA
    St. Andrew's College
    one grant, 2018 · C$3k · revenue -16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saskatoon Regional Health Authority

We operate a health delivery system providing a full range of health care services to residents of the Saskatoon Health Region and other residents of Saskatchewan. Services are provided in hospitals, long-term care facilities, primary…

—
2
University of Saskatchewan

The University of Saskatchewan's primary role is to provide post-secondary instruction and research in humanities sciences and other areas of human intellectual cultural social and physical development. The University offers instructional…

—
3
Saskatchewan Health Authority

The Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) is responsible for the delivery of high quality and timely health care for all the people across the province. The SHA has approximately 40 000 employees and 2 770 physicians who provide services to…

—
4
Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc.

Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc. provides funding through donations to the Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) and other agencies to improve healthcare for the residents of Southern Saskatchewan. The donations assist these agencies in…

—
5
Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation

We run funding competitions that provide: 1. Grants to new university faculty members to start their health research programs; 2. Grants for advanced research training in health areas;; 3. Support for Researchers to exchange ideas and work…

—
6
Royal University Hospital Foundation Inc.

Provide funds raised to Saskatchewan Health Authority for capital construction capital equipment staff education and scholarships fellowships patient care and research within Royal University Hospital. Provide funds raised to the…

—
7
Sask. Valley Hospital Foundation Inc.

To raise funds for a new hospital to replace the current hospital that is over 75 years old. this new hospital will have a 24/7 emergency department and operate as a full services health care facility. it will also be an educational…

—
8
South Country Health Care Foundation Inc

South country health care foundation raises money through donations and fund raising and subsequently grants funds to various capital projects in the south country area of saskatchewan on basis of needs.

—
9
St Paul's Hospital Foundation Inc

The funding received is provided to st. paul's hospital (grey nuns) of saskatoon which in turn funds various programs of the hospital such as education research spiritual care and other programs in support of the mission of sph. in…

—
10
St. Paul's Hospital (Grey Nuns) of Saskatoon
—
11
Broadview District Health Foundation

Raising of funds and use of funds to provide financial assistance for the provision of health care services for the broadview district of saskatchewan

—
12
The Wolseley & District Health Foundation

Secure sustainable health care services in the wolseley district of saskatchewan by providing financial assistance for the provision of health care services for the wolseley district of saskatchewan by donation trust property exclusively…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Living Sky School Division No 202 and the most unlike its peers is Lakeland Library Region. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLIVING SKY SCHOOL DIVISION — C$25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES SASK — C$6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEmpty Stocking Fund — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTURTLE RIVER PARISH FOOD BANK — C$4,500 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetSt. Andrew's College — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBUH Foundation — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwest School Division 203 — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOCK TRAMA AIR RESCUE SERVICE FOUNDATION — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJIM PATTISON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLakeland Library Region — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saskatoon Community F…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…My Tribute Gift Found…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Saskatoon Community FoundationSK7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saskatoon Community Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 890259948:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Meota United Anglican Church’s filings →