Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Katrine, ON · Public foundation

Men of Grandview Foundation

Collection of funds from members for distribution to other community groups and charitable organizations.

C$110k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$20k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$23k
  • C$10k–50k6 grants · C$88k
C$10,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$129k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSKOKA CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONC$20,000
THE TABLE SOUP KITCHEN FOUNDATIONC$17,500
MIND-AIDC$15,000
MUSKOKA WOMEN'S ADVOCACY GROUPC$15,000
LAKE OF BAYS ANGLICAN PARISH WINTER PANTRYC$10,000
HOSPICE HUNTSVILLEC$10,000
FOOD4KIDS MUSKOKAC$7,500
HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ONTARIO GATEWAY NORTHC$5,000
COMMUNITY LIVING HUNTSVILLEC$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$190k · 9 repeat orgsC$18k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

C$190k
C$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$8k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MUSKOKA CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$35k · revenue +125%
  • TT
    THE TABLE SOUP KITCHEN FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$33k · revenue +29%
  • MW
    MUSKOKA WOMEN'S ADVOCACY GROUP
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$30k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MUSKOKA
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Shelter for Huntsville
—
2
West Muskoka Food Bank

The west muskoka food bank is a volunteer driven organization with the goal of alleviating hunger in our community.

—
3
Huntsville Meals-On-Wheels Inc
—
4
Huntsville and Lake of Bays Railway Society

The charity is involved in the promotion of and fundraising for the muskoka heritage place which will incorporate the original goals of the charity itself namely to develop a historic site involving the operation of a steam-powered railway…

—
5
Minnedosa and Area Food Bank Inc.

Distributing food hampers to single persons and families in need.

—
6
Northumberland County Foodbanks

Provide food through a food bank for northumberland county communities

—
7
Stittsville Food Bank

Food bank

—
8
Huntsville District Memorial Hospital Auxiliary

We donate funds to the huntsville district memorial hospital to assist with their ongoing operations.

—
9
Huntingdon County Hospital Foundation

Donating to local hospital

—
10
Musquodoboit Valley Food Bank Association

We exist to assist those in the musquodoboit valley area who are living with food insecurity. we aim to provide a weeks worth of food at each once-a-month visit. we provide shelf stable items along with fresh dairy eggs bread and meat. we…

—
11
Manna Food Bank of Bracebridge Inc

The manna food bank is a bracebridge based food bank serving and supported by the residents of muskoka

—
12
Martensville Food Pantry Inc.

Providing food hampers to individuals and families in need in the martensville and surrounding areas.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muskoka Womens Advocacy Group and the most unlike its peers is Habitat for Humanity Ontario Gateway North. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMUSKOKA CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — C$35,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetTHE TABLE SOUP KITCHEN FOUNDATION — C$32,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetMUSKOKA WOMEN'S ADVOCACY GROUP — C$30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMIND-AID — C$25,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetHOSPICE HUNTSVILLE — C$20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLAKE OF BAYS ANGLICAN PARISH WINTER PANTRY — C$17,500 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetHUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNATION — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY LIVING HUNTSVILLE — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MUSKOKA — C$10,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ONTARIO GATEWAY NORTH — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD4KIDS MUSKOKA — C$7,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Muskoka Community Fou…The John McConnell an…Bethune United ChurchToronto FoundationNorway Point Communit…J.E. Panneton Family …Youth and Philanthrop…Shoppers Foundation f…BenefAction FoundationRbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…Community Foundations…United Way of Greater…
Muskoka Community FoundationON13.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Muskoka Community Foundation · The John McConnell and Margaret Ann Wilson McConnell Memorial Foundation · Bethune United Church · Toronto Foundation · Norway Point Community Church · J.E. Panneton Family Foundation · Youth and Philanthropy Initiative Canada/ Initiative Canada Jeunesse Et Philanthropie · Shoppers Foundation for Women's Health Fondation Pharmaprixpour la Santé des Femmes · BenefAction Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Community Foundations of Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 723095311:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Men of Grandview’s filings →