Skip to content
Canadian charities

Saskatoon, SK · Private foundation

McKeague Family Foundation Inc.

Funding of registered charities and other qualified donees under the canadian income tax act

C$24k
Granted FY2020
6
Grants FY2020
3
Regions reached
C$17k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$7k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$17k
C$1,500
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$222
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST. PAUL'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC.C$17,000
THE KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF CANADAC$2,000
AUTISM SERVICES OF SASKATOONC$1,500
GIRL GUIDES OF CANADAC$1,000
THE SALVATION ARMYC$1,000
THE LIGHTHOUSE SUPPORTED LIVINGC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$62k · 5 repeat orgsC$14k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against -53% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

C$62k
C$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
-53%

Still filing today

80%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    ST. PAUL'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC.
    3× · 2017–2020 · C$56k · revenue +37%
  • TK
    THE KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF CANADA
    2× · 2018–2020 · C$3k · revenue +24%
  • TL
    THE LIGHTHOUSE SUPPORTED LIVING
    3× · 2017–2020 · C$1k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • BU
    Battlefords Union Hospital Foundations Inc.
    one grant, 2018 · C$10k · revenue -53%
  • KH
    Kamsack Hospital Auxiliary
    one grant, 2017 · C$500 · revenue -85%
  • AS
    AUTISM SPEAKS CANADA
    one grant, 2019 · C$500 · revenue -39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saskatchewan Health Authority

The Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) is responsible for the delivery of high quality and timely health care for all the people across the province. The SHA has approximately 40 000 employees and 2 770 physicians who provide services to…

—
2
Saskatoon Regional Health Authority

We operate a health delivery system providing a full range of health care services to residents of the Saskatoon Health Region and other residents of Saskatchewan. Services are provided in hospitals, long-term care facilities, primary…

—
3
Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation

We run funding competitions that provide: 1. Grants to new university faculty members to start their health research programs; 2. Grants for advanced research training in health areas;; 3. Support for Researchers to exchange ideas and work…

—
4
Royal University Hospital Foundation Inc.

Provide funds raised to Saskatchewan Health Authority for capital construction capital equipment staff education and scholarships fellowships patient care and research within Royal University Hospital. Provide funds raised to the…

—
5
Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc.

Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc. provides funding through donations to the Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) and other agencies to improve healthcare for the residents of Southern Saskatchewan. The donations assist these agencies in…

—
6
University of Saskatchewan

The University of Saskatchewan's primary role is to provide post-secondary instruction and research in humanities sciences and other areas of human intellectual cultural social and physical development. The University offers instructional…

—
7
Saskatchewan Cancer Agency

The saskatchewan cancer agency provided leadership in cancer control for the people of saskatchewan through prevention early detection treatment and research

—
8
Moose Jaw Health Foundation Incorporated

The foundation assists with fundign shortfalls of the capital equipment for the dr fh wigmore regional hospital and the saskatchewan health authority. the foundation supports training and development of health care staff.

—
9
Cancer Foundation of Saskatchewan Inc.

The foundation obtained it’s registered charity status on may 14 2018. the foundation's mission is to raise funds to support the cancer needs of the people of saskatchewan. as the fundraising partner for the saskatchewan cancer agency the…

—
10
South Country Health Care Foundation Inc

South country health care foundation raises money through donations and fund raising and subsequently grants funds to various capital projects in the south country area of saskatchewan on basis of needs.

—
11
Schizophrenia Research Foundation Saskatchewan Inc

Grants for schizophrenia research

—
12
St. Paul's Hospital (Grey Nuns) of Saskatoon
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Paul's Hospital Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Auxiliary to the Kamsack Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST. PAUL'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC. — C$56,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBattlefords Union Hospital Foundations Inc. — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SERVICES OF SASKATOON — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIGHTHOUSE SUPPORTED LIVING — C$1,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY — C$1,100 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetGIRL GUIDES OF CANADA — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Arthritis Society — C$700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKamsack Hospital Auxiliary — C$500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS CANADA — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSaskatoon Food Bank & Learning Center — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSaskatoon Bone Research Foundation — C$220 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Saskato…Leslie & Irene Dube F…Saskatoon Community F…Private Giving Founda…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…My Tribute Gift Found…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
United Way of Saskatoon and AreaSK8.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Saskatoon and Area · Leslie & Irene Dube Foundation Inc. · Saskatoon Community Foundation · Private Giving Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2020-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2020. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2021) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 119035699:2020-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on McKeague Family’s filings →