Skip to content

Winnipeg, MB · Private foundation

MBJ Foundation Inc.

Donations to Qualified Donees only activity

C$11k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$2,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$330k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
U of Manitoba Waugh CentreC$2,000
Brain Tumor FoundationC$2,000
True North FoundationC$2,000
ALS CanadaC$2,000
Toba Centre for Children and YouthC$1,500
Native Clan OrganizationC$1,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$19k · 5 repeat orgsC$14k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

C$19k
C$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+47%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    True north Foundation
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$4k · revenue +26%
  • AC
    ALS Canada
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$4k · revenue +13%
  • TC
    Toba Centre for Children and Youth
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$4k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • RH
    Rossbrook House Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · C$5k
  • GH
    Grace Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · C$4k · revenue +19%
  • GH
    Glass Half Full Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue +47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
CancerCare Manitoba

Cancercare manitoba maintains and co-ordinates a province-wide program for cancer prevention diagnosis treatment education and research.

—
2
The Children's Hospital Foundation of Manitoba Inc

The main purpose of the foundation is to raise and distribute funds for the advancement of knowledge and care in the fields of child health research as well as to provide equipment and fund programs at the Children's Hospital of Winnipeg.…

—
3
Fondation Brain Canada / Brain Canada Foundation

Brain canada is a national non-profit organization that enables and supports excellent innovative paradigm-changine brain research in canada. it plays a unique and invaluable role as the national convener of the brain research community.…

—
4
Diabetes Foundation of Manitoba Inc.

research

—
5
Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation

Onf is a funding agency to support research projects relating to neurotrauma injuries.

—
6
The University of Winnipeg Foundation Inc.

The foundation receives donations from annual giving programs and other campaigns. Funds are gifted to the University of Winnipeg for education purposes (scholarships/bursaries) and for capital and capademic enhancement purposes.

—
7
Uhn Foundation

We raise fund for research education and the enhancement of patient care at Toronto General and Western hospitals as well as Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Together with our donors we are…

—
8
Prostate Cancer Canada

Prostate Cancer Canada has continued to responsibly invest the generous donations of Canadians to develop the most promising studies and minds Canada has to offer in the field of prostate cancer research. We have continued to ensure the…

—
9
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority

1) medical surgical and psychiatric healthcare. 2) medical research

—
10
Canadian Myeloma Research Group

In Canada researchers figure prominently in the development of innovative and very promising clinical trials. The Canadian Myeloma Research Group (CMRG) is the first and only national organization bringing together Canada's leading cancer…

—
11
Manitoba Habitat Heritage Corporation

Manitoba habitat conservancy (mhc) is manitoba's leading habitat and wildlife-focused charity directly implementing voluntary long-term conservation through perpetual conservation agreements and habitat improvement through restoration and…

—
12
The University of Winnipeg

Providing education

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grace General Hospital (Winnipeg) Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The University of Manitoba. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBrain Tumour Foundation — C$4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTrue north Foundation — C$4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALS Canada — C$4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGrace Hospital Foundation — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetToba Centre for Children and Youth — C$3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNative Clan Organization — C$3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetU of Manitoba Waugh Centre — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGlass Half Full Foundation — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSalvation Army — C$500 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Giftpact Foundation Inc.MB8.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Giftpact Foundation Inc. · The Pollard Family Foundation Inc. · Price Family Foundation Inc. · The Jewish Foundation of Manitoba · The Winnipeg Foundation · All Charities Campaign · BenefAction Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 796554947:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on MBJ’s filings →