Cedar Springs, ON · Charitable organization
May Court Club of Chatham
1) fundraising projects: (a) women of excellence (b) bingo (c) raffle and 50/50 draws; 2) emergency lunch box program; 3) queen elizabeth ii school breakfast program.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHATHAM-KENT PUBLIC LIBRARY | C$150 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- COCHATHAM OUTREACH FOR HUNGER3× · 2018–2020 · C$12k · revenue +49%
- AIAGRICULTURE IN THE CLASSROOM3× · 2018–2020 · C$1k · revenue -75%
- MOMUNICIPALITY OF CHATHAM KENT PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD2× · 2021–2024 · C$300 · revenue +15%
Funded once
- ACACCESS CANADAone grant, 2018 · C$7k · revenue -97%
- CKCHATHAM KENT WOMEN'S CENTREone grant, 2018 · C$4k · revenue +18%
- LMLKDSB MUSIC PROGRAMgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$2k · revenue +27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing grants and awards to students of the lambton kent district school board
Mental health peer support and self help programs family support programs client advocacy community education meal programs
Health promotion programs such as: medical care counselling health promotion diabetes program ect.
The organization provide a full range of hospital services including 24 hour emergency service.
1) crisis intervention - 24 hour crisis line - accompaniment to medical and legal services; 2) support and advocacy - short-term or long-term support counselling; 3) referral and information regarding relevant community agencies/resources;…
Food Bank
Funding other charities that provide for community needs. types of charities supported during the year include education health arts & culture recreation social services heritage and the environment
We provided after-school and summer tutoring social skills training and soar (transition to secondary school). over 50 volunteers assist with the programs and contribute over 1000 hours. we provide information and referral services for…
The organization's principal purpose is to facilitate information sharing and provide guidance and support literacy programs in the municipality of chatham-kent and essex and lambton counties. services are provided to promote literacy to…
Revenue used to purchase food clothing school items small toys and tools. volunteers between 12 to 20 three times a week for hours 9 to 12 pack purchased and donated items such as clothes kitchen items medical items candles and personal…
Our program is to assist in starting and maintaining student nutrition program in the schools in chatham-kent. we garner funds to enable programs to function and purchase food and equipment. we assist in arranging for volunteers and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chatham Outreach for Hunger Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Communication Disabilities Access Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHATHAM OUTREACH FOR HUNGER ↗
- Who funds ACCESS CANADA ↗
- Who funds CHATHAM KENT WOMEN'S CENTRE ↗
- Who funds LKDSB MUSIC PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds VON CHATHAM KENT KIDS CIRCLE PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds BLENHEIM YOUTH CENTRE ↗
- Who funds AGRICULTURE IN THE CLASSROOM ↗
- Who funds MUNICIPALITY OF CHATHAM KENT PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD ↗
- Who funds ONTARIO EARLY YEARS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Chatham Kent Community Foundation · United Way of Chatham-Kent · Rotary Club of Chatham Service Fund · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Vancouver Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.