Skip to content

Cedar Springs, ON · Charitable organization

May Court Club of Chatham

1) fundraising projects: (a) women of excellence (b) bingo (c) raffle and 50/50 draws; 2) emergency lunch box program; 3) queen elizabeth ii school breakfast program.

C$150
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$150
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$150
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$155k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHATHAM-KENT PUBLIC LIBRARYC$150
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$14k · 3 repeat orgsC$16k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

C$14k
C$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+27%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CHATHAM OUTREACH FOR HUNGER
    3× · 2018–2020 · C$12k · revenue +49%
  • AI
    AGRICULTURE IN THE CLASSROOM
    3× · 2018–2020 · C$1k · revenue -75%
  • MO
    MUNICIPALITY OF CHATHAM KENT PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD
    2× · 2021–2024 · C$300 · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • AC
    ACCESS CANADA
    one grant, 2018 · C$7k · revenue -97%
  • CK
    CHATHAM KENT WOMEN'S CENTRE
    one grant, 2018 · C$4k · revenue +18%
  • LM
    LKDSB MUSIC PROGRAMgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$2k · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crime Prevention and Safety Board Chatham-Kent
—
2
Chatham-Kent Public Education Student Assistnace Foundation

Providing grants and awards to students of the lambton kent district school board

—
3
Mental Health Network of Chatham Kent

Mental health peer support and self help programs family support programs client advocacy community education meal programs

—
4
Chatham-Kent Community Health Centres

Health promotion programs such as: medical care counselling health promotion diabetes program ect.

—
5
Chatham-Kent Health Alliance

The organization provide a full range of hospital services including 24 hour emergency service.

—
6
Chatham-Kent Sexual Assault Crisis Centre

1) crisis intervention - 24 hour crisis line - accompaniment to medical and legal services; 2) support and advocacy - short-term or long-term support counselling; 3) referral and information regarding relevant community agencies/resources;…

—
7
Kent County Community Volunteer Action

Food Bank

—
8
Chatham Kent Community Foundation

Funding other charities that provide for community needs. types of charities supported during the year include education health arts & culture recreation social services heritage and the environment

—
9
Learning Disabilities Association of Chatham-Kent

We provided after-school and summer tutoring social skills training and soar (transition to secondary school). over 50 volunteers assist with the programs and contribute over 1000 hours. we provide information and referral services for…

—
10
Tri-County Literacy Network

The organization's principal purpose is to facilitate information sharing and provide guidance and support literacy programs in the municipality of chatham-kent and essex and lambton counties. services are provided to promote literacy to…

—
11
Canadian Food for Children (Chatham-Kent)

Revenue used to purchase food clothing school items small toys and tools. volunteers between 12 to 20 three times a week for hours 9 to 12 pack purchased and donated items such as clothes kitchen items medical items candles and personal…

—
12
Chatham-Kent Student Breakfast Programs

Our program is to assist in starting and maintaining student nutrition program in the schools in chatham-kent. we garner funds to enable programs to function and purchase food and equipment. we assist in arranging for volunteers and…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chatham Outreach for Hunger Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Communication Disabilities Access Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHATHAM OUTREACH FOR HUNGER — C$12,418 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetACCESS CANADA — C$7,168 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCHATHAM KENT WOMEN'S CENTRE — C$3,999 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLKDSB MUSIC PROGRAM — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVON CHATHAM KENT KIDS CIRCLE PROGRAM — C$1,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBLENHEIM YOUTH CENTRE — C$1,207 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAGRICULTURE IN THE CLASSROOM — C$1,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetMUNICIPALITY OF CHATHAM KENT PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD — C$300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONTARIO EARLY YEARS — C$175 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chatham Kent Community FoundationON10.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chatham Kent Community Foundation · United Way of Chatham-Kent · Rotary Club of Chatham Service Fund · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Vancouver Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 131909459:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on May Court Club of Chatham’s filings →